On the rationality of the head of the official residence:

On the rationality of the head of the official residence:
in my country,
The heads of government at the first to third levels can live in official residences provided by the state.
The area of the official residence is about a little larger than the average person’s home.
The rent collected by the government is about 2% of the people’s wages.
So there are quite a few senior officials,
Rent a house of official residence and rent out own house.
rent out own house and the monthly rent is about 33% of the people's salary.
so is,
Living in a different place, he is can get high as 16.5 times money.

therefore,
have people Report them,
The people think that the law is will Punishment those officials,
But the local head thinks that it is a system problem.
The behavior of those senior officials is wrong, but it is not illegal.
Therefore,
the head of the party thought has to change the rent to 33% of the people’s wages, let it = the rent outside.
But there are quite a few officials protesting,
Finally, the rent was changed to 16.5% of the people's wages.

After the reform,
I think the rent of the official house is still quite cheap.
But acceptable,
it is the welfare of the officials.

論首長官舍之合理性:
在我的國家,
一級~三級的政府首長,可以住在國家所提供的官舍,
官舍的面積,大約比一般人們的住家,還要大一些些.
政府收取的租金約為人民工資的2%,
所以有不少高官,
租用政府的官舍,自家人住在官舍裡面,
自己的住宅則是出租,每月租金約為人民工資的33%.
也就是說,
住在不同的地方,價差高達16.5倍.

因此,
被人民給舉辦了,
人民們認為該法辦那些官員,
但地方首長認為那是制度的問題,
那些高官的行為是不對的,但卻不犯法,
所以首長要更改租金為人民工資的33%,比照外面的租金之行情,
但有不少的官員抗議,
最後更改租金為人民工資的16.5%.

改革之後,
我覺得官舍的租金,還是蠻便宜的,
但可以接受,
價差就算是給官員們的福利吧.