https://steemitboard.com/ranking/index.php?p=58&s=payouts&hl=freebornangel
Rep: 951
Posts: 849
Comments: 332
Replies: 65
Upvotes: 420
Upvoted: 505
Payouts: 1476
Steem Power: 3260
Followers: 1295
Following: 2505
Resteem: 3858
Resteeed: 1776
I guess I am doing ok, much better than some.
Out of ~20k daily authors there I am in the top few percents.
Don't give up, dear reader, my message can hardly be referred to as populist.
Don't miss the Bot Reporter!
This little guy keeps us up to date on who is killing us with bot votes.
I don't know if you have steem steem-ua, but don't be sucked in, its a redistribution scheme to rope in newbs that don't know any better to enrich the very people that already take the most out.
Smdh.
I score about a 5, which puts me in the top 1100.
I'd probably do pretty good, if I thought using a bot to self vote, while scheming newbs out of their own selfvoting returns, was a good idea for steem.
'We will give you a vote proportional to your weight in our scheme that is heavily weighted to the status quo, if you delegate to us.'
Read their literature, if you don't believe me.
It's bad enough that 19,900 of us have to split what the top one hundred leave for us, but now the 'savior of the blockchain' is trying to grow on the backs of those of us with the least.
The top 10 voters give out 30% of the rewards, the top 100 give out a percentage that I haven't seen, yet.
If you can give me that number I will include it in the next Report from the Shallows.
It's never gonna be easy to come in to steem cold and make a living.
It's not gonna get easier to get noticed.
No shortcuts to glad handing the folks.
You can try the schemes but you will likely end up being joe parrot, the cdbgh guy, the gold guy, or our favorite subsidized dumbass, JB.
The et al of stinc, et al, took rewards away from everybody to give to that guy when one of the first things he did was show up in his underwear and then they stuck with him until he videoed fellating himself.
Seriously, this is why nobody has confidence in the coin, just look at our 'leaders' decisions.
Smdh.
We continue to suffer from the petulance of our keyholders' decision to stick us with linear rewards, just because doing nothing makes us look weak, and going back makes the choosers look dumb.
Why are flags not separated from downvotes taking only rewards and not rep?
'Oh, yeah, because you said so, sorry, I glossed over that part,...'
