If you are part of a group that excludes people on the basis of their speech, just know that echo chambers eventually exclude the majority of people that are willing to join groups.
At that point the exclusionary group loses the political battle and might as well not exist.

Can we point to instances of this in the hive as an example of this axiom?
Probably.

Just look around, the ninjaminers, early adopters, and their sycophants are doing well.
But the excluded group is growing larger each week and bad mouthing us to anybody that will listen.

A certain new token is raking it in and giving it to those willing to brown nose with their content, but excluding any dissent.

Good luck with that.

We've tried that innumerable times in the past, and it has failed each time.
Only the leaders of the group benefited and the rest of us had our rewards reduced in order for it to be so.
Ganging up to increase rewards is bad for everybody not willing to join in on the reaping.
When whales, and large gangs, vote 'popular' content, everybody else's rewards go down.

Is it time for another 'whale experiment'?
Long overdue, iyam.

Popular speech doesn't need protecting.

By the ruling accounts only allowing to profit those that never express dissent is a sure fire recipe to drop from #3 to #327.
It took a few years, but here we are.

Are you are tired of paying your masters to bomb children in far away places?
Perhaps it is time you pushed back on that.
A simple way that anybody can do that is to hoard your coins.
The fed buys coins at face value from the mint.
A dollar of change in your pocket is a dollar of value out of the banksters' pockets.
Stop playing in their shell game that allows them to play in the amusement parks from hell and shop in the human grocery stores.

Hunter's cat in the cradle

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.