as i was just saying to 
I guess that's a.i. decisions for ya, but maybe if you look around you'll find banks who are actually trying to get IN to 2018 instead of trying to hold on to the 1960s ... there's a lot of Morganites who still seem to think they own the place and don't understand the first thing about de-centralization because it's never been part of their world. To have to actually consider someone wouldn't play along. They're the original whale. I'm sure if you look around enough you'll find a few establishments with both at least a few decades on the market AND a fresh view, nose in the future, not up the argh of the pasti'll put you one the voting stack but i can't make promises, i'm lagging behind, i'm almost considering another account just to be able to vote on everything while giving back to everyone who did to me lol.
It's a big world, banks are 13 a dozen, but it's like bars, you know, if they don't like your shoes and they dont want your money. You can always go next door :)
I think we'll be seeing a lot more as "deep learning algorithms" do risk assessment. Gods know what this will do to insurance and health sector .. or even worse : crime prevention . Some a.i.'s already have been caught growing racial bias, simply because their datasets are taken from real life so they will mirror it because that's what they're programmed to do. But they will do this clinically, colder than Vulcan logic.
I wouldn't lose sleep over it, plenty of banks in the sea
link to article at medium
image from respective site
medium is a pretty decent site with HQ content from people that should be doing duplicates of their writs on steem imo ... if you go there, give the guy some claps, they get paid from subscription money paid by readers. It's not really 2018 but it has the heart in the right place