Scientists have or confirm a theory called or perhaps called the Big Bang and the origin of this great universe. Will it be trustworthy or does the Big Bang have a well-founded basis to trust it? Some scientists believe that the universe began to form through a great explosion of several energy, which was generated from an exact point where all these energy was concentrated in the matter of the universe. What we can now call the Big Bang. "This already called Big Bang was the peculiar beginning to all this that exists at the moment. The beginning of this great universe, the beginning of a great space, and even the starting point of time itself (Scientists affirm)”.
None of all this that we observe today would exist before that exact moment. In addition, what happened was something, that was out of time, out of space and out of matter, so that the beginning of our existence was caused. The confirmation that our great and amazing universe began, and did not always exist, brings many enormous and great challenges to all scientists who do not believe that the universe was created by God.
Yes. At the end of the year 1920, the astronomer named Edwin Hubble one day saw through his own telescope that the galaxies (a few million light years away) were rushing towards each other at speeds too fantastic. This step was not caused by a gravitational force or a push. Rather, they were still moving as a result of a primal explosion, all from the same point of origin.
At this point of origin where these explosions were created, all the mass that the universe possessed was very compressed at a point of infinite density. This point that is a little smaller than a single atom. 2 Then, in a cosmic explosion that was impaled by him. - The Big Bang - the universe came to begin to exist. Steven Weinberg, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics, gives a more detailed description on this subject: "Just one hundredth of a second, the time was the shortest we can talk about with certainty, the temperature of the universe can be said that it was around on the basis of a hundred billion (x1011) degrees centigrade.This was even much hotter than in the center of a star that is the hottest in the universe, so hot that you can say, that none of The components of matter found in the ordinary generated, molecules, or atoms, or even the nuclei of the atoms, could have been held together and this great universe was filled with a lot of light."
This can be seen very oddly parallel to the part where the bible says that, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth ... and God said, 'Let there be light,' and there was light." It did not arise from matter, but from a pronouncement. A spoken word on behalf of God. "Be the light." As for these texts that were sacred to all of these major religions, only the book of the Bible describes what scientists have been discovering since then: there was a great explosion of light and a beginning of a great universe that is ours. .. Out of this same universe. With it has come the beginning of space, and of matter and time. This was the point of a singular departure for everything. Again and again in the book of Genesis we can find the description, "And God said ..." followed by "... and so it was."
Instead found asía, our grandiose universe may be that it could have arisen through the laws of physics, such as gravity, electromagnetism, the speed of light, among others.? It's not that, because all those laws still did not exist. The initial start-up of the universe itself produces the laws of physics and all this began without those laws.
The so-called astrophysicist Robert Jastrow, a self-described agnostic, made a statement: "The seed of all this that has happened in our great Universe was planted at first, one of each of these stars, and each of these planet and all living beings in the universe came into existence as a result of events that were launched just at the time of the cosmic explosion that occurred.That was literally the moment of Creation of the entire universe, and you can not know what caused that to happen. " As has been said, this whole conclusion is really worrying for these scientists who are atheists. Having a reaction and not being able to document that cause is very disturbing. Since it leaves without foundation any affirmation.
Jastrow concluded that: "For the scientist who lived by faith, and by the power of reason, this story ends like a great nightmare, because they have climbed some mountains in ignorance; and they have also been about to conquer the highest peak of ignorance, while they were pushing to get to the end of the rock, were greeted by a group of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries and sigols. " An image of tube relief on the part of these scientists when astronomers such as Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold and Fred Hoyle were able to advance what was known as the "stationary state" grand universe in 1948. The theory of the era was that the universe was infinite in its age. Therefore, creation or a cause was not considered necessary.
But nevertheless, in a decade in the 1960s, the theory of this steady state had to suffer a blow too devastating when some radio engineers were in the Bell Laboratories (Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson) and had an encouraging and mysterious discovered in a radiation that came from space. Also came from all and many directions that were the ones that cacted the radiation. And when it was possible to measure the temperature of said radiation, it was possible to confirm where this strong radiation was produced. These radiations have not always existed, or they will come from somewhere in the universe. It came just from that particular moment, originating in creation. At the latest, in the year of 1996, a NASA satellite called Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) could also confirm, in addition, that the radiation indicated in the background indicates a great explosive start of the universe. The levels of hydrogen, lithium, deuterium and helium that exist in our universe today also confirm it.
Are there many of these scientists who still want to face the implications of the so-called Big Bang theory? these scientists who do not feel quite comfortable living with: An unknown cause or (2) the conclusion that God is the cause. So you can opt for a third option?.
What other explanation do these scientists find for the beginning of our entire universe, energy, time and space? This will be simply to deny the premise that is fundamental science is based on everything that begins to exist must have its cause (A reaction must be caused by an action). The physicist Victor Stenger as he calls the universe says it may have started "without cause" and may "arise out of nothing." The philosopher named Bertrand Russell took a stand in a debate about the existence of the all-powerful God. And he said: "The universe is simply already here, and that's it
It is one thing to say that something may be eternal, and therefore the "cause" is not necessary. But it is totally different to scientifically observe a beginning of something wonderful, and start something immediately, and then try to say that it had no cause. Even the acknowledged David Hume, one of the most skeptical of all philosophers, considers this position to be talked about as ridiculous. Despite his skepticism, David Hume never denied causality. In the year 1754, Hume came to write: "I have never affirmed something so absurd as a proposition that something can arise without cause."
Any of these theories that have been pointed out that it does not really have a determining cause, ends up being only a supposition spoken by scientists, a random effect of the universe, this is something that goes in total contradiction with the laws of physics, and the order shown by some of the organisms of living beings. Nothing that is random effect has such perfection.
You may believe that this great universe had a singular beginning, such as an explosion, where all that we know that it is - the universe, time, space, scientific laws that we observe - were originated, this can be very absurd. But nevertheless all this had its beginning. If you have ever come or wanted to believe in God, but in kisses you certainly did not want to do it in contradiction by the facts or what known scientists speak, science offers you thousands of reasons to believe that the great all-powerful God really exists and It was He who created all that we see powerfully.
It is logical that you can conclude that God, who is from the beginning, eternal and out of time, created time. God who is present everywhere in the whole universe and can not be confined in outer space, he also created space. God, the all-powerful, who is real spiritually, is not physical, and outside matter, is the real origin of our universe and all that is. In contradiction to what it poses or the theory of the Big Bang, God all powerful that has many attributes that living beings can not imagine he could the power to create the entire universe in just an instant, and with the intelligent order that has this great universe currently.
"Lift up your eyes and look to the heavens: Who created all this: Do you not know Have you not heard, The Lord is the eternal God, creator of the ends of the earth" 10 "... Because he commanded, and they were created. "
What it says in the Bible is that God formed the earth to be inhabited, thinking of us from the beginning. He gave people the breath of life, He gave man a brief life on earth with the purpose that I will seek and find him. If we do not get to know him, we have lost the whole purpose of our existence. Who knows better than God, the reason for our?
This is what it promises: "Draw near to God and he will draw near to you." If we are going to look for him to know him, God says: "And I will be found by you." In fact, he says: "Do not praise the wise in his wisdom, or in his bravery praise the brave, or the rich will praise his riches." But in this he who praises himself: in understanding and knowing me "
We have the great and wonderful opportunity to know the almighty God who was who brought with him the beginning of this wonderful universe.
I hope you like it you can follow me @carlos-farias