The "science of climate change" has many ramifications, which will for sure be developed at some point in the future. But for now, we will focus on a few important things that will help you understand any further blogs about this urgent topic.
CO2 IS GOOD FOR PLANTS AND FORESTS, THE GREENER THE PLANET IS, THE BETTER FOR HUMANS!
In 2014 already, NASA was surprised to see that forest absorbed more CO2 than previously thought. The news appeared on the dailymail.uk soon after the release of the study emphasizing on the need to protect rainforests from deforestation to help counteract human greenhouse gas emissions.
Did you hear about 'any save the forest" on TV by any chance? Anyway some are taking action, but a different kind of action, not which advocated by the UN and Gore: First Vertical Forest In Asia To Have Over 3,000 Plants And Turns CO2 Into 132 Pounds Of Oxygen Per Day (many amazing pictures)
Never mind, the 'alarmists" claim that the study is dangerous: It should be seen as a warning light, rather than an excuse not to curb emissions. (carbonbrief/2016). When you see a comment like this one, you know that something is wrong.
Have you ever heard the alarmists expose the rate of deforestation in the Amazon by any chance? Of course not because it is what they want to be proven correct! Here below is a picture (among so many) revealing the man-made damages. Here are a few numbers: although it seems that deforestation has slowed down a bit, the plunder is real: 768,935 square kms in 2016 at this link: Calculating Deforestation in the Amazon
So now let's follow the money trail....
If Al Gore gets his way, the carbon footprint industry will generate $15 trillion in carbon trading. Yes let's repeat it: 15 TRILLION! At this stage if you still believe in Gore's nightmare scenario, here is something that is going to open your eyes a little bit more. From the telegraph.uk: The great carbon trading scandal. Since the product is invisible, the cons are endless: How Scammers Steal Millions Through Carbon Markets. Probeinternational.org already reported the ongoing frauds in 2011 and the finding are appalling.
Or did you hear anything about this huge scandal in the news last year?: Multi-billion euro carbon-trading fraud trial opens in Paris, a scheme that cost the European Union €5 billion, a case that has been described by French authorities as “the heist of a century”! Would you think that amid such rampant frauds, the alarmists would at least admit to having lost their case for global warming?
Nope... the alarmist hysteria shows no signs of slowing down.... ‘Millions will die’ without a carbon tax to fix global warming, says a New Jersey U.S. Senate candidate in hysterical online 2013 campaign ad .... New research shows global warming’s effect on the quality of food available could kill more than 500,000 people a year around the world by 2050, a guardian.uk headline read last year.
BUT WHAT ELSE, WOULD YOU ASK?
PS: Earth Custodians did not read the Nature Geoscience report here below but trust its interpretation, especially when considering the big picture about this matter.
Climate Alarmists Finally Admit ‘We Were Wrong About Global Warming’ | September 21, 2017 | This is the inescapable conclusion of a landmark paper, published in Nature Geoscience, which finally admits that the computer models have overstated the impact of carbon dioxide on climate and that the planet is warming more slowly than predicted. The paper – titled Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C – concedes that it is now almost impossible that the doomsday predictions made in the last IPCC Assessment Report of 1.5 degrees C warming above pre-industrial levels by 2022 will come true. In order for that to happen, temperatures would have to rise by a massive 0.5 degrees C in five years. Since global mean temperatures rarely rise by even as much as 0.25 degrees C in a decade, that would mean the planet would have to do 20 years’ worth of extreme warming in the space of the next five years. This, the scientists admit, is next to impossible. Which means their “carbon budget” – the amount of CO2 they say is needed to increase global warming by a certain degree – is wrong. This in turn means that the computer models they’ve been using to scare the world with tales of man-made climate doom are wrong too.
How bad the situation really is, is all over the internet, one just needs to be aware of the scandal when googling this up. How sickening! Anybody probing all this will realize quickly that money will never save the world, but a change in mindset. The Earth Custodians Movement is for a futurist and money-free society. No yet (fully) convinced? Well, where is the point in having a zero-sum game economy where nobody can profit (money circulates but is not hoarded), assuming that the challenge is understood by society at large? That's the ultimate question we'll be facing at some point.
The Earth Custodians will always provide content that shakes minds and requiring the readers to do some homework because Truth is exposed everywhere and that no content is fully original, moreover one cannot resolve the issues with the mindset that created them. Yes, it is possible to see way ahead of the curve, and if it takes one generation for a money-free society to take shape, that shouldn't prevent anyone from taking action, and using money strictly for online advertising until a critical mass (20% of population) is reached. The metaphysics of the Earth Custodians Movement is The Spiritual Science Of Vibration