Your theory cannot cope with ALL the problems solved by the dark matter hypothesis. The only viable atlernative IMO consists of the MOND theories. Definitely not yours.

In the end, it's very simple. There is no reason for formulating the dark matter hypothesis , other than that it's existence is inferred from gravitational effects as predicted by gravitational (space curving) theory. Therefore, there are only two possibilities:

1. The underlying model is incorrect, since without the postulated existence of "dark matter" in order to straighten things out, it's predictions do not match with observations;
2. The underlying model is correct, and we're just missing some pieces of the puzzle. So, if we only find the right "extension" this time around, all shall be fine.

And since the Biefeld-Brown effect clearly suggest a correlation between the Electric field and gravity, such as our proposal "gravity = grad E", which is NOT solved by the dark matter hypothesis, we can at the very least establish that our aetheric proposal confirms and quantifies a little known phenomena and it also explains why Martin Tajmar was unable to repeat Brown's results. All one needs to do is look at his capacitor/electrode configuration with the knowledge that gravity = grad E to realize that his configuration won't fly.

Furthermore, the experiments by David LaPoint with plasma under the influence of magnetic fields show very clearly that electromagnetic forces are the dominant forces all the way from the sub-atomic to galaxy scale.