In the end, IMHO the most important experimental data to consider is Young's experiment, which gave rise to wave-particle duality:

Wave–particle duality is the concept that every elementary particle or quantic entity may be partly described in terms not only of particles, but also of waves. It expresses the inability of the classical concepts "particle" or "wave" to fully describe the behavior of quantum-scale objects. As Albert Einstein wrote: "It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do".

Through the work of Max Planck, Einstein, Louis de Broglie, Arthur Compton, Niels Bohr and many others, current scientific theory holds that all particles also have a wave nature (and vice versa). This phenomenon has been verified not only for elementary particles, but also for compound particles like atoms and even molecules. For macroscopic particles, because of their extremely short wavelengths, wave properties usually cannot be detected.

From this basic scientifically established fact, we can come to two hypothesis

1. Particles must be some kind of electromagnetic phenomena, by definition involving rotational phenomena (see Maxwell), and therefore consist of a number of vortices, for example like this:
   (Source: Nassim Haramein)
2. Quantum Mechanics (but only for the micro-scale). From WP:

Wave–particle duality is deeply embedded into the foundations of quantum mechanics. In the formalism of the theory, all the information about a particle is encoded in its wave function, a complex-valued function roughly analogous to the amplitude of a wave at each point in space.

In other words: we have one hypothesis which follows Einstein's suggestion to "hold on to physical reality" and results in a nicely integrated "theory of everything", and we have a hypothesis involving the definition of all kinds of " gauge fixing" solutions within an abstract field concept which has lost all connection to the underlying basis, namely the aether theory Maxwell used to derive his equations.

Application of Occam's razor suggests option 1 should be selected, since that requires only one assumption:

• A physical, fluid-like, compressible non-viscous medium exists.

I leave it as an exercise to the reader to figure out how many assumptions are contained within the standard model, but I can guarantee you it's more than one.

From our model, all known particles are simply the same phenomenon at a different oscillation frequency, hence bigger or smaller resulting particles. So, the experiments performed at CERN are simply interpreted as the interference of a number of electromagnetic waves and vortices, whereby of course conservation of mass, momentum and energy should apply.

So, what would you expect to see when bumping particles with different frequencies into one another, known as "heterodyning" in RF engineering, creating an interference pattern?

Gee, could we perhaps see the differential frequencies come to the forefront?

And since it's not a common practice in RF Engineering to give all the possible results of a heterodyning exercise a new name, why would we need to do so when considering frequency bands which only differ in that they lie higher than usual?