What is wrong with the current paradigm? Please explain it to me in a few words. I don't want to read a 10 pages essay. There is no such a recursive relation with charge and when you quote that matter is an electromagnetic phenomenon, this is just meaningless to me. Can you please state how you understood the wave-particle duality? Your starting points sound non-understandable to me.
I would also like to recall that energy conservation is connected to Poincare invariance, or the invariance of the physics laws under translations (which are part of the Poincare group). This is not "nothing" as you claim. And creation/annihilation processes are real and observed. Which is what has taught us in his posts. You cannot refute these because you just don't like them.
I will not go further into details of your theories (let us spare my time and yours). I would just like to say that relativity, quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, etc... (modern physics) correctly predict most of all observations connected to the microscopic world. Can your setup do as good? I honestly doubt about that.
A scientific theory will not be thrown away because anyone claims it is wrong. It will be replaced if someone propose a new theory that does at least as good as the older theory. And this theory should give back the current paradigm in some limit, otherwise the latter would not work so well.
RE: Geometry and Conservation in Nature