Why Were Dinosaurs So BIG?  The Truth About Black Holes and Other "Physics" Fairy Tales

This is in response to the recently trending steemit article about Black Holes, and liberosist 's other article about the death of massive stars.

It all sounds amazing and wonderful and complicated and I used to believe it too, but unfortunately, none of what these articles say is true.  It is not that the author isn't stating the theories correctly, but the theories are just plain wrong, and the latest physics experiments are proving to be a huge embarrassing inconvenience to these fairy tales.  As a result, the theories continue to get even crazier, and everyone that has been indoctrinated with this non-sense is either waking up, or just piling up against the fence where they normally get fed, mooing like crazy. 

"You can lead a physicist to knowledge, but you can't make him/her think!" -RE

In A Nutshell - Quantum Theory and the Flying Dinosaurs

I have so many things to say, and much of it is based on the electric universe theory, the Thunderbolts Project, and common sense.  I'm not sure the best way to organize them or if I'll ever get to them all, so I'll just rattle off some basics that he left out of the articles, and then dive deeper in afterwards if I haven't lost you by then.  CAUTION: I may have to make this into a 36 part series.

Relatively Speaking

To begin, quantum theory is mostly math and the math has errors in it.  The theory of relativity is a thought experiment, not a physics experiment.  Light doesn't bend around stars due to gravity, this has been proven; there is some bending due to it traveling through plasma around the star.  Light does not experience a Doppler red shift, the universe is not expanding.  Light DOES get emitted at a different frequency based on the age of the matter; older electrons emit bluer light, younger ones, redder light.  The Andromeda galaxy is not on a collision course with our galaxy, it is just older.  Newer galaxies have redder light because they are younger, not because they are moving away. The speed of light is not constant, gravity is not constant, the speed of light is not the fastest speed that things can communicate. There is no such thing as quantum tunneling, and no "spooky action at a distance"... there is something going on, but it is not spooky, it just means they don't know what is going on. 

Seeing Stars

Stars may not be fusion powered, they are most likely an electrical pinch in a Birkeland current. There is no such thing as a neutron star, that would be impossible... stars that turn on and off are most likely an electrical oscillator circuit in a massive Birkeland current. 

Dark Matter or Doesn't Matter

You can't have more than one "black hole" per universe, that would be impossible by the very definition and math of a black hole. Even Einstein himself admitted near the end of his life that both of his theories would not withstand the test of time.  His theories do match up in many ways with reality, but in many other ways are completely flawed. So yes, you can use his theories to predict and accomplish many things, but if you do, you also arrive at a dead end when trying to explain certain physical phenomena and end up inventing all kinds of garbage, like black holes, neutron stars, dark matter, dark energy, gravity waves, big bang, string theory... none of it is needed if you are doing real physics.  They should just call it "doesn't matter", ha ha!  

Flying Dinosaurs

Gravity travels at 20 billion times the speed of light, light is a wave not a particle, there is an "ether".  Particles don't exist in two places at once.. when this occurs it means you got it wrong, you are missing something. The gravitational "constant" is just a consensus. Gravity is most likely a type of charge, not related to mass. Dinosaurs were bigger because Earth's gravity charge was less 65 million years ago, and the charge changed due to impact with a meteor of a different charge. Pterodactyls would have been way too heavy to fly with the current gravity. You won't get these things from a university degree though for some reason... it is almost as if someone doesn't want you to know! If you are doing physics, it should make sense; if it doesn't make sense, then it is not physics. Follow the white rabbit Neo!

Birth of Black Holes - Schwarzschild's Stillborn Baby

Again, believe it or not, physics needs to make sense. Otherwise it may as well be called magic or sorcery!  This is the way physics used to be back before math took over physics... "physical" experiments used to be done to prove things, and not just thought experiments or confusing looking math equations, where everything seemed to cancel out nicely. 

Black holes were actually born out of mistaken equations where Einstein and others fudged their numbers, and did a bunch of other no-nos including assuming the speed of light was constant, assuming that the speed of light was the fastest speed to communicate, assuming light could be both a particle and a wave, assuming that there was a Doppler effect to light, that causes it to red shift, assuming there was no ether (even though it was already proven multiple times that there was an ether).

I won't go into the details of what they did, but an excellent video to watch on this is Steve Crothers, Baking Einstein's Cake, where he breaks down the math so anyone can follow it, to show how when they got stuck, they just made stuff up.

Gravity Waves or Gravy Waves?

There are all kinds of amazing artist's renditions of super-massive black holes, neutron stars, swirling black hole computer simulations, but NONE OF IT has ever ever ever been observed in reality. Although, plenty of things have been observed that don't match these theories, but physicists and astronomers will squint their eyes, and look into fun house mirrors, all to try and make what they are seeing fit into theories, instead of getting rid of bad theories.

In the Black Hole article, liberosist happily reports how "magical" it is:

 But the real magic happens when two black holes attract each other. They  merge in a violent event that sends ripples through spacetime -  gravitational waves - far across the universe. Incidentally, the first  gravitational waves from a black hole merger were detected by LIGO  towards the end of 2015. 

The truth of the matter (ha ha), is that gravity waves are just made up, and the declaration was most likely to just get more funding. According to Wal Thornhill they were just "gravy waves"!   They spent a billion dollars on the thing, so they had better at least pretend they found something.

More likely, something else is going on, and Wal has an excellent step forward in the right direction on what gravity actually is:

Supernovas, neutron stars, lions, tigers and bears, oh my!

Stars and their formation are another area where mainstream science has it all wrong.  

Kristian Birkeland

A Norwegian genius named Kristian Birkeland, 

came up with the CRAZY theory that electric currents connected the sun and the planets. He actually traveled to the Arctic to take the first magnetic field measurements of the Earth's polar regions to try and figure out what causes auroras.  He was originally ridiculed by mainstream science but his theories later proved to be correct.  

And it turns out that the currents that connect the stars and planets could most likely be the cause of their creation... experiments in the lab and images from space have shown that stars could actually be formed from electric "pinches" in massive Birkeland currents. An electrical pinch occurs when the stable forces in the plasma structures carrying the current, collapse and emit light.  This is theorized to be why stars have been seen forming like they are on a string.  

Barely Scratching The Surface

Planets too, could most likely be formed by these same currents from enormous lightening bolts  both excavating and depositing materials from planet to planet, much like the way jewelry items are plated with metal, using charged cathodes and anodes.

This is why many of the craters in our solar system, on both planets and moons, or hexagonal in shape.  The craters are not the result of meteor impact, they are the result of massive bolts of electricity. This process has been shown in the lab, and the shape of the impact is based on the voltage.  Also, most supposed meteorite craters do not show any type of side impact, which is statistically impossible, especially for the smaller moons, whose gravity would not have an effect on an incoming projectile.

In Conclusion

Hopefully I have given you something new to think about. Ultimately, don't believe me!  Don't believe anyone; research it thoroughly and come to your own conclusions, but certainly don't believe something because someone famous or intelligent said it, or it was taught at a prestigious University... intelligent people can do very stupid things, and people that don't have a lot of intelligence can come up with some really great ideas... judge the ideas not the people.

NOTE: Jeff Berwick was not harmed in the making of this post!