I’ve been thinking about how we can discourage the pattern of groups tolerating powerful people with well-known patterns of coercive sexual behaviour. (eg Harvey Weinstein in Hollywood, Justin Caldbeck in Silicon Valley, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump in politics etc)
I recall a while back in a discussion of police misconduct and race, someone described the police force as 10% people with truly ill intentions, 10% people with truly good intentions who will look to do the right thing no matter what, and 80% who simply will follow whatever the social norms happen to be. I think this is roughly true of groups in general, whether it’s the police or the film industry or the tech industry or politics. This means that changing the incentive structure to swing social norms can have an enormous impact.
Accusing someone powerful of mistreatment carries with it enormous risks, large enough that most people who have been harassed are unwilling to speak up about it.
Even A-list actresses such as Gwyneth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie, who carry plenty of power themselves, were unwilling to take that risk until the full extent of his misbehavior came out.
NYT piece on Gwyneth Paltrow & Angelina Jolie
One way of reducing that risk is by acting in groups. When there’s a large number of people accusing a powerful person of sexual misconduct, it’s much harder for it to be perceived as a “he-said, she-said” or “false accusation” sort of story.
This makes me think that it could help to have a method for people who have been mistreated by a powerful person to find each other anonymously online, share their experiences, and choose a plan of action. This reduces a sense of isolation and solves a coordination problem that otherwise holds people back from taking action.
As an example from a different domain, Yelp forever changed the balance of power between small businesses and customers by allowing customers to coordinate in sharing their good and bad experiences of a business. I’ve been able to cause significant harm to businesses (as well as connect with other wronged customers) by leaving them bad Yelp reviews.
There are also actions that everyone can take as well. Specifically – it’s on all of us to take any accusations we hear about seriously and be proactive in dealing with them, especially if we’re in a privileged position to do so and can have an impact.
Basically we need to spread new social norms that the 80% of people in the middle group I mentioned earlier can follow.
- Sexual misconduct can end your career and put you in jail, no matter who you are. I’d imagine that even a ~20% risk of losing everything due to sexual misconduct would be enough to keep powerful sociopaths in line, and smaller risks would easily keep the 80% of the people in the middle from behaving poorly.
- Associating with someone who engages in sexual misconduct after it becomes broadly known should hurt your social status.
- Sitting on reliable information about sexual misconduct from a victim who wants help and not investigating or acting on it should hurt your social status.
Some interesting links for further reading :
Resilient cooperators stabilise long-run cooperation in the finitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma
Callisto System - Sexual assault reporting platform with match-based reporting
I'm a black ex-cop, and this is the real truth about race and policing
