You have spoken well and i can't agree with you more Hive account@flauwy, well first Markus you were paid for the services you offered to the smart cash community, right? you said you wanted change, why don't you start that change off by showing other developers the code behind the fork tipbot etc when they first ask you to, well you thought you were doing the right thing like what they are doing now right? or you thought that's the only reason you are still a member of the hive and once you give that Info's out you would be fired?
Any reason that lead to this shouldn't have made you ask them for a ransom to release the fork code of what they paid you for unless you have a different intention and only coming out clean because they refused your offers.
Its a shame, you maybe right but with the way everything went you definitely didn't do the right, now this is it.

Every project founders in the crypto world gets more of this often and we ain't surprised anymore, all crypto project starts as a centralized body before decentralizing.
This takes time and all this stories you are making up isn't going to make things better but might make people FUD Ont the project you were paid to help grow and that isn't good, tell us weren't you paid monthly like those founders?
Did you disclose how much they are paying you to us and other bonus.

The best way to stop evil isn't with good,
Iseems your evil isn't evil enough.

Lets assume you are trying to help investors like you stated earlier because they are bleeding and you demanded for that 5,000,000smart to distribute back to them, equivalent to 120kusd for destroying your reputations like you claimed, i bet you won't have written this post and would have kept your kite hole shut, rather took the money and ditch people you saying you are protecting, i don't believe that, its all lies, money and men,
That's how we behave, but due to the fact they refused your demands of the ransom, You are screaming to the world to see you are innocent and did that on good purpose, bruv if you are the founder you would have done worst, they have a lot to loss if smart crashes.
Calculating their money and stake is so so wrong buddy. Smart isn't just a crypto project but in some ways a company. See beneath a crypto dev, smart is a company that got stake holders to it,

Satoshi worths a lot, go check his known wallet, so does every dev who worked with him. Why haven't he airdropped to btc holders or isn't btc decentralized.

If the founders haven't put all they got from the start, y'all think it would have gotten to this point that its on now. So they took a risk into a project, reaping it shouldn't bother us well i don't see the reap, they paid them selves for the work, when nobody believed in this coin they stood their grounds, planning, and finding ways to elevate the project, you said they used you, well you are only right if they haven't paid you once but if they have forget it, we the community should be the one saying you all including the founders used us still using us and making us believe in what don't exist, a community driven cryptocurrency that we hold the fate of the coin, now that brings us to the fate of the coin, the proposal section.

• THE PROPOSAL SECTION ISN'T WORKING, YOU DAMN RIGHT ABOUT THAT.
  the smart whales are the controllers of proposals, they decide which proposal YES/and the ones that NO'S.

When on telegram, you started the fact about benn swann activities pulling the price down cause of the insane amount , i supported you 💯 percent cause i knew that proposal was doomed and "the price is making smart look stupid in the market"

The proposal section has to be addressed fast cause all this is making it look like smart isn't keeping to their promises, i agree on that.
Recent proposals shows only two with yes, including my proposal of creating a song for smart that everyone told me to go ahead, wonder what is giving it a bad signal after much pressure by everyone to go ahead and create a song.
Meaning their are heavy players not regularly on discord that decide what is done. That's where i have issues.

I did trust you so much man but you broke my heart man, with all this.
What was you idea behind asking for ransom like some terrorists
Tell us the truth and stop covering with the founders holding 70percent of want they created,their ideas. Isn't supposed to be but since its also allowed i see no problems there.

And to smartcash founders, i know you guys are trying to fight spam and scam in the proposal section, but its time the treasurer be put to work for the smarter good,

The amounts sitting there is so alarming, make us feel save, that the 50 percent is for everyone - the airdropping of the treasuries like lets say 30 percent to the community should be encouraged,the funds needs to spread and this would increase smart visibility too as a monthly reward coin (smart rewards)
And a monthly smart airdrop too.
Since the proposal section is controlled by bigger players, smart cash voting system isn't working, i tagged it a hierarchy .