Image Source

Symbolic interaction theory underlines that a man can act toward others as well as towards self. One essential segment of self is identity is the individual's comprehension of who he or she is. For an interaction among people to continue easily, there must be some agreement with respect to the identity of each.

There must be a response to the inquiry "Who am I in this circumstance, and who are these other individuals?" Only by noting this inquiry in some detail can every individual comprehend the suggestions that others have for his or her arrangement of action. Now and then, a man's identity is extremely uncommon, and in outcome, interaction ends up ungainly, troublesome, or even unimaginable.

Think about the old story by Cervantes of a man who thought he was made of glass. This present man's origination of himself made issues both for him and for others. At whatever point individuals drew close, he shouted and begged them to ward off for fear they would smash him. He declined to eat anything hard and demanded resting just in beds of delicate straw. Worried that free tiles may fall on him from the housetops, he strolled amidst the street.

When a wasp stung him in the neck, he didn't swat it away in light of the fact that he feared crushing himself to bits. He guaranteed that his body's unordinary development empowered his spirit to see things more obviously than others, and he offered to help individuals bewildered by troublesome issues. He step by step built up a notoriety for bewildering knowledge, and many individuals came to him looking for counsel. At last, a rich benefactor contracted a protector to shield him from outlaws and fiendish young men who tossed stones at him.

Image Source

We are not prone to meet somebody who trusts he or she is made of glass. However, we may experience individuals who trust they are abnormally delicate, astoundingly solid, superhumanly smart, or in contact with the heavenly. People with surprising characters can make issues in social interaction, and they make it hard to accomplish agreement.

Cooperative action is troublesome without such accord, for individuals basically don't know how to identify with people who demand that they are superman. The self possesses a focal place in symbolic interaction theory since social request is conjectured to lay to a limited extent on self-control. People endeavor to keep up self-respect in their own eyes, but since they are persistently captivating in part taking, they see themselves from the perspective of the others with whom they communicate.

To keep up self-respect, they should meet the norms of others, at any rate to some degree. An individual will think more about the suppositions and gauges of a few people than about those of others. The people about whose assessments he or she minds most are called significant others.

These are individuals who control critical prizes or who possess focal positions in gatherings to which the individual has a place. Since their positive sentiments are very esteemed, significant others have generally more impact over the person's conduct.

Image Source

The symbolic interactionist viewpoint has a few in number focuses. It perceives the significance of the self in social interaction. It stresses the focal part of symbolic correspondence and dialect in personality and society. It tends to the procedures engaged with accomplishing agreement and participation. What's more, it lights up why individuals endeavor to keep up confront and dodge shame.

Criticisms of Symbolic Interaction Theory

• First criticism concerns the harmony amongst rationality and feeling. A few commentators contend that this point of view overemphasizes reasonable, self-conscious idea and de-stresses unconscious or passionate states.

• Second criticism concerns the model of the individual certain in symbolic interaction theory. The individual is portrayed as a particular personality write — an other coordinated individual who is concerned fundamentally with keeping up self-respect by meeting others' measures.

• Third criticism is that it puts excessively accentuation on agreement and collaboration and along these lines dismisses the significance of contention. The point of view recognizes, in any case, that associating individuals may neglect to achieve accord regardless of their endeavors to accomplish it.
  

  
  Image Source
  

References:
Social interactionist theory
Social Interactionist Theory and its Related Terms
Symbolic interactionism
Learn About Symbolic Interactionism