When it comes to the issue of free speech on social media, where I agree with everybody is that social media companies should follow my perspective on free speech.
That's where the overlap generally ends.
My perspective is that social media companies should choose to bind themselves to the First Amendment. I manage my socials in the same way that I think that social media platforms should manage the platform. I allow all speech, no matter how vile, unless it's speech that could land somebody in jail as a direct incitement of violence. I never unfollow or block people due to political disagreements. I unfollow unfaithful ex-girlfriends, and the guys she fucked, people who are dangerous to actual friends, and people who engage in harassment. In the case of harassment, I probably still have too high of a threshold.
Still, my view of how social media companies should handle speech isn't to take away your right to manage your account however you want. I'm not going to say that you shouldn't be allowed to block/mute or unfollow anybody, including me, at will for any reason.
You shouldn't even have to find a person offensive to drop them. You can just find them uninteresting. You can just not value certain people to rid yourself of them. If you have thin skin, you can make your own account into a little echo chamber. If you're a coward, you can manage your page in a way that you only hear ideas from people who won't question you. You'll get no arguments from me. I would prefer to have you not be in my life anyway.
My opposition is focused on corporate overlords attempting to make those choices for us.
It's intellectually dishonest for the dickholes to claim that my position is that you have to be forced to hear what I have to say. I don't believe that. I just don't think that a board of directors composed of people we've never met should choose what we can say or hear for us anymore than a government should.