You are so off base. Firstly, I'm an atheist and a Darwinist. Secondly, I'm interested in revisionist marxism, Fabian socialism, civic republicanism, and libertarian socialism. Libertarianism, classically speaking, is/was communist anarchism and collectivism/mutualism. The term "libertarian" was coined by Joseph Dejacque to describe communist anarchism. So, libertarian socialism refers to the ideas of Proudhon, Bakunin, Kropotkin, Bookchin, et al. American libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism is entirely different. Classical libertarianism is a left-wing ideology. My own ideas are influenced mostly by Philip Pettit, Eduard Bernstein, Fabian Essays in Socialism, David Graeber, Noam Chomsky, Murray Bookchin, Henry George, and Thomas Paine. I align closely with the ideas of Scott Santens and Martin Farley, the basic income advocates.

For the record, I'm not saying Marx is bad, just that he's overrated and has eclipsed more interesting figures like Proudhon, Kropotkin, Bernstein, Blanqui, Shaw, et al. Also, the Lange-Lerner model of socialism is more interesting. Marxism and Marxists have dominated socialist thought and tended to eclipse other more interesting ideas. And, if you had read my other works, you'd know that I am definitely not a right-wing "free-market libertarian." I actually fall closer to being a social democrat, but much farther to the left.

Also, btw, I mentioned right-libertarians (Rothbard & Menger) specifically to criticize their economism, not to endorse their ideas. And I criticizes Marx for sounding too much like a right-libertarian in certain parts of his economic analysis.