It is a very naive way of thinking. Do you think native tribes or the Amish need someone to give them money? They farm on their own land and make due, and they even have technology too(Amish are starting to adopt tech now).
Giving animals food just trains them to be dependent. There are signs in the forest that say don't feed the bears/animals for a reason. Most humans are no different. Same as a spoiled kid who get money for doing nothing, they don't care about it and have no desire to work hard. Same as the person who lives at home with his parents still well into his 30s, as long as the parents continue to allow him to live there for free and he gets free food and whatever he will keep doing it.
We can't see past our own noses on this issue because WE are spoiled with technology. If jobs truly are lost and people need a way of surviving they will have to get some land and farm. No reason people can't be self sufficient with farming(doesn't take much land). The USA used to have over 90% of the population grow their own food and were completely self sustainable.
Giving people free money is a lazy uneducated utopian way of thinking that proves you haven't don't any research into the topic.
"Farming Then and Now
In the 1800s each farmer grew enough food each year to feed three to five people. By 1995, each farmer was feeding 128 people per year. In the 1800s, 90 percent of the population lived on farms; today it is around one percent. Over the same period, farm size has increased, and though the average farm in 1995 was just 469 acres, 20 percent of all farms were over 500 acres.1 And the trend has continued to accelerate. "
RE: A Necessary Next Step