Hey PS. I think the bad part of the proposal system is that we (the community) take every vote so personal. Because people are so vested (which is a good thing) it creates winners and losers with every vote. If it were a "preference process" and then the team could decide knowing the opinions of the community members (individually and collectively), then I think this type of thing would be a good thing to vote on.
However, as currently configured, in conjunction with what Matt said that he wants the DAO to vote on these things, then I feel that these votes are more divisive than productive.
In reality on this issue in particular, there is a natural dynamic from the "customer always wanting a cheaper price in ANYTHING" vs. the "business always wanting the most earnings possible in ANYTHING". So trying to find the right balance is not as easy as making a binary decision. (meaning $2 or $4 and nothing else considered)
Since I look at both sides of the argument and feel that each has its merits, then I will be opting to find a better idea than either $2 or $4. I believe its possible and I hope the community doesn't get divided so bad that we are unable to find a 3rd alternative that works much better.
I'm willing to discuss further with you or anyone if you want. I'm happy to find solutions, but I would prefer not to have a divisive DAO vote until we've had further discussion.
RE: $2 Conclave Arcana Packs? Let's Do It!