This sounds like a great opportunity for the long term growth of Splinterlands, I wish this was done on day 1! I'm all for the DAO owning its own liquidity, I believe it is an important step towards an ultra sound SPS (deflationary).
This may potentially be a great marketing opportunity for the Splinterlands community as well if we do it right, so let's make the most of it!
With that being said, I do have some concerns as well. In the long term after we get the marketing from Sushiswap, would it not be better for the DAO to simply periodically sell small amounts of SPS on market for ETH, pair it with ETH and add it to LP? This is essentially what we are doing with these "bonds" but with extra steps (and extra fees!!)
Furthermore, if this passes and we vote yes on further proposals for the Splinterlands DAO to own liquidity, I would be careful about the next steps of reshuffling LP incentives too much. I would suggest reshuffling LP rewards gradually instead, for example, start reducing LP rewards by 1% per week instead of 1% per month.
Lastly, please ensure you include both pros and cons for a proposal in the actual proposal itself. I am a serial proposer, and I love including lots of information for both sides of the argument so users can make a clear and informed decision. I believe education is paramount in ensuring the DAO functions efficiently.
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - SushiSwap Bonding Protocol Launch Partnership