I'm a fan of this and not a fan of this at the same time.
Overall my vote will come to a YES for this proposal, but . . .
✅
- No multi accounting
- Riskier to bot
- Riskier to use battle helpers
- Tournaments move back towards more skill based gameplay
❎
- KYC is not a good look for a Crypto Project
- There will be players that either can't or don't want to provide KYC, who will have a wayy smaller pool of tournaments to choose from
- Competition overall lessens in tournaments (Less players, gives top players an easier time to farm top rewards)
- Outside media could interpret Splinterlands use of KYC and give us a bad name (Might not happen, but could, it's just my thoughts)
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Require KYC for DAO Sponsored Tournaments