But if Steem decided to ban this by definition, started removing or blocking posts like that, or having official committees deciding what goes and what doesn't, I would be very alarmed.
So would I. If Steem ever acquires a committee able to block posts, I'll be gone. My post was only meant to counteract 's post and raise the issue of a clear conflict of interest taking place.
Also, I wanted to prevent this perception from spreading:
Steem is used by BitShares shareholders to acquire new investors and then use their capital to salvage their own failed BitShares investment.
It's completely untrue (and I don't think BitShares is a failed investment) but we need to be aware that perception is not a rational beast - it just needs one small incident to be able to flourish.
RE: Is the Steem social contract being abused? Steem funds are to be used to sponsor unrelated projects.