Because we don't know if /
is owned by Steemit, there was considerable pressure for witnesses to go along with Steemit Inc and this hardfork.
This has been the case for many HF now. The majority of the top witness would drop out of top 20 if they were to lose 's vote.
's influence goes beyond the top 20 witnesses.
also has a substantial influence on the witness ranking. He only votes for 5 witnesses at the moment.
' proximity to Steemit Inc also creates pressure for top witnesses to get in line with Steemit Inc.
These pressures, although not ultimate factors, have created with this HF and in the past, situations where there are high risks to go against Steemit Inc's HF (and potentially lose or
' vote) with very low possibility of reward, (delaying, stopping an hardfork while proving it was justified).
This is one aspect of Steem which would benefit from more public exposure.
RE: Steem Governance is Multiparty