You are right, he stopped responding on the important questions you asked and went self-defensive.

I might not see it from the same point of view as you do since I have used the site for quite some time and its clear to me that you can easily check how your posts would've benefited from being featured in the Hive account@ocd compilation posts by seeing who the big vote supporters of the ocd posts are and who the big vote supporters of the posts they have nominated are. Also knowing that no one else so far has complained about it and all comments by the nominated authors in the ocd posts have been of a positive nature would've made it clear that we might not be as bad as you are trying to make us look in your post which lacks enough information about the project.

If someone explains something to me that sounds like garbage, why would I go looking for more information about it?

This is true, I wouldn't either.

But if I'm going to go ahead and write a whole post about it accusing it of this and that I would make sure to do some research on it before doing so. Not just base it all off of one person's comments about it.

My tone would've been different if it had been in a more general sense that there might be projects doing what you are stating, not directly attacking the one project that happened to stumble upon your post.