Yes, it was a false claim. I do believe he meant that they get upvoted instead of resteemed as I usually vote the nominations a day after the compilation post. That's why I started my explanation with "there might have been some misunderstandings".

You were also claiming a lot of false information about our project based on nothing such as:

created strictly to benefit financially from the content other people create

If an account wants to republish your content in full from their page, they are going to make money from content they didn't create. You will make $0.

They may promise you exposure. They may promise you some sort of reward. But I guarantee you, they are using you for content and taking money from your pocket.

These are all false claims against our project which would've taken less than a few minutes to check before stating this in your post.

Here is the latest compilation post that I have curated the nominations on, as you can see the first nomination is just under $30 and before I voted on it it was at around $5.

Anyway, apologize for the way he reacted to your comments. As I mentioned earlier he isn't part of the curation team anymore and that sort of attitude he was portraying there was visible often in the chat room as well.