Fork it because they're selling their stake so let's rob them of that right because freedom.

If this was a corporation, if a large stakeholder wanted out you would suggest to just start another corporation and invite all the stakeholders over except that one large stakeholder since you cannot "fire" stakeholders. Don't worry about how illegitimate, underhanded and wrong it is to leave that stakeholder holding the bag, because you can justify everything as soon as you dress up in the victim costume you wear so well and dawn whether it's "what Bernie did to me" or "what my family did to me" or "what 'friends' did to me" and finally when you cry and whine about "what strangers did to me" because then so what if what you're suggesting is the equivalent of theft, robbery, fraud, scam, because "the deep state psyocoplaus" and "whales are scumjerky" are perfect excuses for suggesting and acting like you have, after all if they didn't deserve it you wouldn't suggest it.

Them vs me. "Those 'insert racial slur'." is literary the vast majority of all your "posts". The rest are either your real life friends, your online friends, your family and your encounters with strangers, along with a few " logic, grammar and rhetoric, JK, teasing, you couldn't trivium yourself out of speaking on someone else's behalf any better than you could reason by my profile pic that I'm a "faggot" and "pederast", apropos, did you know that pederasty is what the proto-whiterace ancient forefathers of ancient greece, the great Macedonian empire plundering and enslaving their own neighbours were the ones who originally and AFAIK, solely, practiced " mentoring" young boys with oral and anal sex? Because it seemed to me that you were trying to insult me, OVER THE INTERNET, with something that if your theory of my profile pic meaning I'm a faggot and a pederast, would not be insulting any more than telling a gay man that he likes men, or a "pederast" that he likes young boys. Or was that insult to simply say that I have no right to ask why you choose to champion preaching that two men loving one another is wrong and that black, Muslim and brown don't belong in "white society", because what does a " pederast" like me know?

Either way. How does that quote go:
Small minds talk about people, average minds about events, brilliant ones about ideas.

Ergo, guess what mind I take part of?

Fork it because they're selling their stake so let's rob them of that right because freedom.

And concluded with:

Or was that insult to simply say that I have no right to ask why you choose to champion preaching that two men loving one another is wrong and that black, Muslim and brown don't belong in "white society", because what does a " pederast" like me know?

I know, you're probably thinking:
This "pederast" "retarded faggot" with his "homo" profile pic and his 'commentary' saying I'm the eternal victimizer playing the victim, justifying victimizing because of the victimhood at the core of my fractured being that is plastered in every me vs them post and comment, he doesn't know shit, they deserve it.