You got it ! Again, Dan is just making assumptions based on the few posts he sees. He hasn't actually pulled any data to show how many downvotes people have actually used. This whole notion of "bad whales" is nonsense in my opinion and from what I can see, and what I hear from talking to people, most are pleased with the way things have been going. Of course there are going to be people like
who will complain, but who really cares about a post bragging about how much someone has earned that says the same thing that's been posted hundreds of time on here? Does that add value to Steemit? I don't think so and either do many other "bad whales".
RE: Whale’s dilemma