Yes. We call that "Whataboutism". Nothing is denied, just the "questioning of motives". Sort of a back-handed ad-hominem "argument". The article is factually correct, no matter what the "motive".
Yes. We call that "Whataboutism". Nothing is denied, just the "questioning of motives". Sort of a back-handed ad-hominem "argument". The article is factually correct, no matter what the "motive".
RE: The ugly truth behind Steemit... on MEDIUM, who AREN'T scammers.