To be honest, I feel doubt about aiming for the healthy community in several sides of Steemit.
It is a text in trending a few days ago.
The contents seem to inform Bot earned more than 16,000 dollars by the automatic posting activity.
The contents can have truth or they can be a simple slander.
It’s not important.
The important thing is the text that received recommendations from 300 people was blinded due to just 8 objections.
Steemit developers concede the Bot activity.
It seems like they intend to make Bots unable to use their power finally by letting community members monitor and downvote the behavior that Bots receive upvote.
However many members recommend the healthy posting, it is deleted if a powerful Bot presses objection button just one time.
Many people recommend the whales’ postings.
Even the text ‘I had a meal today’.
In fact, it is a phenomenon that takes place in any community.
It is friendship.
but It is more excessive situation than it.
Because this side can expect practical reward in return.
On the contrary no one will dare to object to the whale.
Because the damage from it is enormous.
The person like 
While sacrificing whales, all of the whales’ votes disappeared.
So the income sharply decreases.
Into a result of losing just some supporters not a number of supporters.
All of these phenomena are because the community is small yet, there aren’t dolphins in middle class, and the whales have too big power. It is impossible to make the same earnings by receiving the support from a number of dolphins while losing a support from one whale.
The reason why block chain is recognized with its credibility is because it has majority. But if the majority doesn’t have a big meaning in such block chain and community, can it gain the reliability as expected?
How about lowering the whale’s power a little and distributing the portion to minnows now?
PS. As I’m poor at English, I asked somebody to translate my opinion.
So please understand I can hardly give you an answer.