Black Panther’s story originates in the fictional nation of Wakanda, touted in the comic as the only African country that was never colonized—though many tried. Over the years, observers have drawn real-world parallels between Wakanda and Ethiopia, which was never officially colonized, but was occupied by Italy in the 1930s.
Without outside powers extracting its resources, or imposing exploitative policies, Wakanda flourishes and becomes the most technologically advanced country on earth, rich in natural resources such as the fictional element Vibranium. (Sound familiar? It’s what Captain America’s shield is made of.)
To understand more about “Black Panther” and the history it reflects, we got some help from author Adilifu Nama, author of Super Black: American Pop Culture and Black Superheroes.
HISTORY: Why is ‘Black Panther’ so important?
Adilifu Nama: What makes the Black Panther such a significant figure in American popular culture—as well as black popular culture—is its groundbreaking representation of blackness as more than a stereotypical and racist trope of inferiority. We have to keep in mind the historical context of the superhero’s first emergence—in 1966, against the backdrop of the Civil Rights and burgeoning black-power movement. That becomes important because in many ways [the emergence of a black superhero]…marks a racial transformation happening on a political and social level.
Talon fighter over Wakanda, from the movie Black Panter. (Credit: Marvel/Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures/Everett)
Talon fighter over Wakanda, from the movie Black Panter. (Credit: Marvel/Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures/Everett)
What is the significance of the nation of Wakanda?
Wakanda symbolizes a wonderland of possibilities: What would have happened to a society not [affected] by the devastating impact of racism and colonialism? In that sense, the film is a beacon for the black imagination…what blackness could be in the future.
Why do you think this film resonated so widely before it was even released?
I would argue that “Black Panther” as a film project is probably more attuned to being a black science-fiction film than a comic-book adaptation. The groundswell of buzz and anticipation, particularly across black communities in the U.S. and world, is not a function of millions of comic-book readers that have followed the Black Panther in the various iterations you have in Marvel Comics. This film speaks to a broader pent-up demand and desire to see a science-fiction version of blackness that is on par with a “Star Wars… We’ve never seen this kind of visionary…African/black representation of super science, and technological advancement and social standing outside the historical [context] of colonial
[It is] such a strong allegory [of] our contemporary moment, given the way in which racial tensions—in American society in particular—have come to the forefront. Particularly in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement and the comments by the president disparaging African nations, black football players standing up by kneeling… Against that type of backdrop, films such as “Get Out” and “Black Panther” have a vivid resonance
Which Came First: The ‘Black Panther’ or the Black Panthers?
It’s complicated. Stokely Carmichael gave his famous “black power” speech at University of California, Berkeley, a few months after the character’s debut, and that fall founders Huey Newton and Bobby Seale named their movement the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense. But according to author Adilifu Nama, the Black Panther Party borrowed its moniker from Alabama’s Lowndes County Freedom Organization, which had adopted a panther logo. To escape the name’s radical political connotations, Marvel tried having Black Panther go by “Black Leopard” in the early 1970s, but it didn’t stick. And, over the years, the “Black Panther” standalone comic did delve into politics, featuring the titular character fighting racist forces such as the Ku Klux Klan and the “Republic of Azania,” which was an allegory for apartheid South Africa.