It's with great delight I welcome you to the eight edition of SteemMag, a weekend digest for Steemians.
Every weekend, I take a look at some of the most important topics on Steemit and also reach out to top Steemians who have expert views on such topics.
In case you missed it, here are links to Issue #1 , #2 , #3 , #4 , 5 and #6 and #7
This week, I will be taking a look at one of the most important topics that has been on the minds of steemians – The user retention rate. Several posts have been written positing different opinions about the true nature of Steemit’s user retention rate. Is it declining, stable or increasing? In a quest to give the true situation of things 
There are several factors affecting the user retention rate. Dissatisfaction of new users is a key one. To stop this, a number of projects are being undertaken by various Steemians.
SteemMag reached out and chatted with a number of them. Really interesting chats. I had a great time doing this. And I’m sure you will enjoy it too ;)
In page 1:
SteemMag had a chat with 
-We also had a chat with Team Leads of Project Curie and The Robinhood Whale Project
In Page 2:
In page 2, to conclude the superchargers of Steemit series, we had a chat with a co-founder of Blockpay.
We also reached out to a number of steemians asking them:
You've had a series of really low payouts. At what point did you decide not to give up and stick to Steemit?
and a number of other exciting features(including a special shout out you wouldn't want to miss ;)
A chat with
SteemMag:
You've been tracking Steemit's user growth and retention rates for 3 months now, what is your overall impression of the current state of steemit? And what are the most salient improvements you've noticed?
From my perspective I feel that Steemit is a little ahead of the curve... I think the lower STEEM price is a good thing as it is allowing the site to undergo a period of much needed consolidation. Steemit as a concept and its perception in the marketplace is still very immature.
The massive 2000% spike in STEEM price thrust Steemit into a larger spotlight a bit prematurely, it needs time to cement recent gains. The best improvements I have seen are the diversity of content and multitude of diverse authors trying their hand at making Steemit work. (Something that is close to my heart and that I feel is crucial for the success of steemit.)
From my own featuring experience and behind the scenes in the curie project it’s great to share the experience of an author finding meaningful rewards below their content for the first time and knowing you had a small something to do with it, especially when they know nothing of all the behind the scenes involvement.
SM:
A major feature of your presentations has always been the user growth among different continents. Which continents (and country) have been the biggest gainers and losers?
The biggest winner has been the Americas since 
And as a country this is the USA
Europe is pretty static and the rest of the world picture is very static.
SM:
What are those things that can be implemented (UI and otherwise) to improve the 'stickiness' of the site and boost user growth?
I think that there are better heads than mine that would be able to answer this question but I think boosting user growth is not necessarily what’s required at this stage.
I think what steemit needs most before it embarks on aggressive growth is a large “middle-class”. After all it is a very active and growing middle class that drives real economic growth in economies in general. Since steem is an “alternative-economy” experiment it’s going to have its growing pains and it’s hard to predict what will emerge and at what rate as it evolves.
Thanks
A CHAT WITH 
, THE LEAD STEEMIAN OF THE ROBINHOODWHALE PROJECT
SteemMag:
How has the journey been so far?
Very enjoyable although minor hiccups do occur here and there. Everyone is putting in some very long hours but when the authors DM us to thank the team it kind of reassures us that we are doing the right thing.
SM:
What have been the challenges you've faced so far in the drive to reward deserving authors?
RHW:
One of the main challenges is digging through all the content. There are thousands of posts being published daily and it's even harder when the majority is stolen from elsewhere.
Another of our main challenges is curating 24/7. We currently have a slight pause of around 6-8 hours during the evening (EU time) when only one of our curators is online and a second is needed to verify the content and approve. We have had a few people that use bots with RHW express there concerns about this pause and we will be solving it hopefully by tonight by allocating a seperate shift.
SM:
Which areas would you like to see further improvements on Steemit?
RHW:
Distribution and user retention.
Distribution needs to be evened out so more whales and dolphins are curating. This would solve the second problem of retention as most authors par a few whale-botted and celebrity users are raking in most of the rewards.
SM:
Whats next for the robinhoodwhale project?
RHW:
We are internally talking about creating a "Daily Featured Authors" series to grow RHWs SP while also rewarding the authors with more SD.
We also have a "long-shot" idea of making Robin Hood Whale a witness. While we do understand 66000 MVests is a very improbable target in terms of votes for being a witness, without very big whales (witnesses) upvoting us.
Thanks 
A chat with 
, The Editor of Steemit 101 ebook and Lead, Project Curie
SteemMag:
What motivated you to start Project curie?
Project Curie developed organically. A group of Steemit writers came together to discuss common interests. It turned out that the main interest we had was getting rewards to some other people besides just ourselves. We were concerned that Steemit was not rewarding undiscovered and emerging authors.
So we decided to pool our own votes on certain posts that the group liked. And then when the opportunity arose to channel some whale votes to those same posts, we jumped on it, realizing that we could bestow some more meaningful rewards. Soon, our whale friends trusted our work and our process, so they allocated more votes to Project Curie.
I am just grateful to work with so many great people on this project and be helping whales have a great effect on making Steemit's content more diverse, while also rewarding/encouraging authors who need help getting noticed.
SteemMag:
Have you seen any improvements so far since you started the project?
Yes, certainly. The Trending page of Steemit has many more posts from undiscovered and emerging authors now. They are not usually in the Top 10 or even Top 20 (what I call the "VIP section"), but below that many of the writers, painters, photographers, poets, chefs, and others we find are getting more exposure.
And as the community finds them, we are seeing a few each day who rise from that group and break through onto the Trending page. So Steemit is becoming more diverse and more people are getting rewarded for their high quality content. It's a win-win situation. We don't want to grow Project Curie too big, but we hope to add a few more whale accounts on a different set of posts, so that we can reach more deserving authors than we can get right now. It's making a huge difference so far.
SM:
What do you think as to be put in place by the co-founders to better retain new users?
The co-founders and development team are doing amazing work with Steemit. I look forward to their next round of work to continue building out the Steem ecosystem. Personally, I think Steemit as currently designed is operating quite well internally. It's not perfect, but we're finally starting to see greater diversity and rewards going to emerging authors.
I don't think we need a lot of internal changes right now, which often create more controversy than they're worth; we just need to let it develop organically so that more communities can form around tags and languages and interest areas.
I would look at the external audience and how we can get them here: friendly site, sign ups, apps, some retention programs of some sort. I'd love to have some sign-up system for mentoring programs and somehow assign people to groups where there was a person who could work with them to become more successful in creating content.
Mentoring is time-consuming work, it's drudgery, but it's rewarding, too. I spend much of my time mentoring. And we need good people to help mentor others in many genres. For example, I don't know much about art, but if someone starts posting on Steemit who clearly has talent but doesn't understand how to organize and present a good post, I can send them to 
SM:
Where do you see Steemit at the end of the year in terms of contents and users' retention rate?
While I'd like Steemit to catch on like wildfire and go viral, steady/natural growth is fine also. 
I love that Steemit has become the go-to site for Bitcoin and cryptocurrency people as well as anarchists. But to grow big we'll need many more communities like those joining us. One good thing about having a low Steem price is that it hopefully encourages strong hands. We should have a period where people who believe in it + more investor-types can buy in.
And the really great thing is that anyone who earns rewards or invests suddenly becomes a stakeholder. That gives them reason to help us build it, so once they are in, there are more people rowing our boat and driving it forward.
Also, I think the other pillars of the Steem ecosystem will be good additions when they come. This thing will be like one giant octopus with tentacles reaching all over the online economy, drawing people in, synergistic and more than a sum of its parts. Beyond the money, this is free content, free from corporate control and government oversight to a large degree. This is already proving to be a very cohesive and fun community, which will grow in many more interesting ways when we have those other pieces available also.
Thanks
Check out page 2 for more awesomeness :) and a special shoutout ;)
Page 2