I think you are being dishonest.
Steemvoter has been around a long time, and a week ago had never had a down vote. If people were really against this it would have had some down votes before. Other than a few "special" people who think their opinion is more valuable than the community because they signed up early, steemvoter seems loved by most. I often see messages of support in their posts, and again, before a week ago, I don't recall seeing one negative comment.
Yes they might not have made the best choices, but they seem to be trying their best to serve the community, unlike you (with this message and possible actions).
I don't have a problem with down voting, or saying your peace, but using down voting as a threat is just silly and destructive to a community. From what I can tell, the people who told steemvoter that they don't like what they are doing was received by steemvoter and they are trying to improve things. Personally, I think they should not change a thing (other than improving continuously for the community).
IMHO if you care about this community you will think about how destructive you are being/threatening to be towards it, and look at steemvoters history (before this past week) and see that the community has supported it.
I am using a non-account for this, because I don't want my SP to influence anyone.
UPDATE
The user above has edited their post since this writing.
RE: Steemvoter News: Dust Settles and a Curation Guild is Born (Part 3 of 3)