Where is Sheikh Hasina's failure? Why did India not vote for Myanmar issue in the United Nations, why China voted against Russia, a group of people voiced it against The government fails, Sheikh Hasina fails, diplomatic activity fails - like Jamaat-e-Islami, they are expressing their scholarship to say these things. Just say this, before pondering the scholarship, Niaan sees a little in his folly. Why are you saying nothing without knowing, let's just focus on that.
If you do not know anything then there is nothing to be ashamed of, just know the right information before saying something. The shame is that even after having no idea, argue about that matter as an ignorant. In the Third Committee of the United Nations on the subject, the resolution was recently adopted and the record was passed in a large number of votes, to stop the violence in Rakhine, to ensure honorable return to Rohingyas with humanitarian assistance, to punish the culprits for violence. On behalf of the 135 countries in the world, there were only 10 against the country and 26 countries abstained from voting.
In the same issue in 2011, which was 94-25-63 respectively Here's the diplomatic success of Sheikh Hasina's government. Do not give praise to Sheikh Hasina's leadership for this success, you have not been a person of their nature. But why China, Russia, why did you vote against, why did India refrain from voting? And the problem is here. This is where you recognize the ignorance. Let us see the past history of the resolutions adopted by the United Nations Third Committee. After the 2011 issue on the issue of Myanmar on behalf of Iran, Syria and North Korea, the highest number of resolutions passed in this committee.
Against this, the low voting records are also against this time. And this is due to the extensive acceptance of Sheikh Hasina's leadership and her personality worldwide. Come visit this time about India, China, Japan and Russia. First of all, each country is governed by its own rules and regulations, not the desire or reluctance of any other country. If we talk about China or Russia, after reviewing the history, these countries have not voted for any time in the country-specific resolutions, they have always been against. This time there was no exception. The situation in India is almost the same. However, India has also voted against the country's special resolution. Some days ago, in the resolution of Myanmar in 2011, India voted against India. They withdrew from that position and now they have stopped voting. Even the Jewish state Israel voted in favor of resignation. If you want to know more about this, go to the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly and look at the details of the resolution and voting information of different times. Hope the narrown of mind will be overcome.
BNP's statement on corruption allegations of Padma bridge was completely political - said senior BNP leader Barrister Moudud Ahmed. I realized that the BNP political party is now calling it a political statement. But what is the name of the civilized name of some educated half-educated Padma Bridge that Sheikh Hasina's government has done corruption? Of course, the two ears do not fall for nothing.
Dear steemians, the 
Its a great opportunity for us.all my steemit friends if you join with me please login our discord grouphttps://discord.me/fundition
Thanks a lot for give me in your valuable time ,again thanks..