While it may seem there is no escape to the roll out of the coming 5G technology it is important to be as informed as possible as to the potential long term effects that it presents. This is becoming increasingly more difficult because of the marketing surrounding the benefits of how our lives will improve because of the faster more efficient flow of data, and the control of the information and how it is displayed in the news feed.
For those who don't know 5G is short for “5th Generation.” The stated purpose of this technology is to improve on the speed and consistency of 4G connections, enabling it to maintain more precise functions. We are being told that 5G will provide mobile users with faster, more consistent wireless connections, 5G technology will change many areas of life. In the hospital, doctors are being introduced to robotic equipment to perform surgeries and other essential functions. But hospitals are not alone in adopting robotics. Manufacturing has also taken an interest in this technology using it to perform functions that involve extreme temperatures, harmful chemicals, or other conditions that now supposedly disqualifies human operation. Probably the most widely advertised advantage of this technology is the driver-less car. These vehicles will be in constant communication with a data center opening the door to total control over the vehicle and its occupants. To further entice the general public about the marvels of 5G, virtual reality devices have become increasingly advanced, gamers are able to immerse themselves in a world that is harder and harder to distinguish from the real one.
And anyone who thinks mind control will not be actively utilized through gaming is extremely disillusioned.
There will be few areas of life that will not be impacted and controlled by 5G technology.
Image Source
The reality is that 5G technology opens a Pandora's Box that may never be able to be closed again.
The International Journal of Oncology research article titled World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack stated:
“In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. RF radiation was classified as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. Further epidemiological, animal and mechanistic studies have strengthened the association. In spite of this, in most countries little or nothing has been done to reduce exposure and educate people on health hazards from RF radiation. On the contrary ambient levels have increased. In 2014 the WHO launched a draft of a Monograph on RF fields and health for public comments. It turned out that five of the six members of the Core Group in charge of the draft are affiliated with International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), an industry loyal NGO, and thus have a serious conflict of interest. Just as by ICNIRP, evaluation of non-thermal biological effects from RF radiation are dismissed as scientific evidence of adverse health effects in the Monograph. This has provoked many comments sent to the WHO. However, at a meeting on March 3, 2017 at the WHO Geneva office it was stated that the WHO has no intention to change the Core Group.”
In Before the First Cup Jules discusses how 5G Terahertz has the capability to see through walls, frisk you at a distance, and tear apart unzipping DNA.
The Environmental Health Trust has answered commonly asked questions about children and wireless radiation since children are at an increased risk for cancer due to exposure to these devices. The American Academy of Pediatrics supports more research into how wireless exposure affects human health long term in particular children's health.
Even living in the vicinity of cell phone towers has a dramatic effect on your health.
Image Source
Of particular interest is the US Patent US 6506148 B2 entitled,
"Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors" begs the question, what is the main objective of the government, with families and children spending countless hours in front of the television, phones and computers?
“Mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours: a systematic review of association between study quality, source of funding, and research outcomes.” Neurological Sciences, 2017.
“In our review of the literature and meta-analysis of case–control studies, we found evidence linking mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours especially in long-term users (greater than 10 years). We also found a significantly positive correlation between study quality and outcome in the form of risk of brain tumour associated with use of mobile phones. Higher quality studies show a statistically significant association between mobile phone use and risk of brain tumour. Even the source of funding was found to affect the quality of results produced by the studies.”
Martin Blank, PhD
Associate Professor, Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics,
Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons; Researcher in Bioelectromagnetics; Author of the BioInitiative Report’s section on Stress Proteins states:
“Cells in the body react to EMFs as potentially harmful, just like to other environmental toxins, including heavy metals and toxic chemicals. The DNA in living cells recognizes electromagnetic fields at very low levels of exposure; and produces a biochemical stress response. The scientific evidence tells us that our safety standards are inadequate, and that we must protect ourselves from exposure to EMF due to power lines, cell phones and the like, or risk the known consequences. The science is very strong and we should sit up and pay attention.” Source
