There is perception, there is understanding, there is knowing, there is implementation.
With money, right?
Not, respectively.
I think people know something first.
So, he counts himself for something.
For example, there are those who have bottomless wells.
A moment comes, the color of the job is different.
He did not know what you thought he knew, he did.
You carried it as a hammall.
People first feel this as "perception."
There is no sense at first, because the logic that will turn it into understanding does not accept the new perception.
"Come on," he says, out the door.
Labor is necessary, cost is required, patience is necessary ...
After a step, the mind regulates in the accumulation of the knowledge of the escapes to make room for new perception, entering the effort to create a clear background.
At that time, the old logic is also contemplating pursuing those with new perception.
It leaves you with an idea like "it or me".
His concern is to protect his own existence.
"You can not do it without me, I've got my hands on it for years, do not do it ..."
The greatest trump card in your hand is fear.
That great battle starts here.
The enemy, the friend, the square is you.
The logic that resists patience on the way in which it enters is beyond this imperative and begins to understand the pieces of information that come with perceptions.
"Understand" is the reporter of the beginning of the formation of a new logic system.
The mind that begins to understand, whatever it understands, begins to form its knowledge.
This is important, attention!
Look, we say, "to create the knowledge of what you understand".
New information is forming, important.
Let us repeat: first the perception, then the perception becomes the meaning, the creation of its own knowledge of understanding and the new logic.
What does self-knowledge mean?
Outside knowledge, what do you mean?
For example, chicken egg is from egg, egg is from chicken and the question is now an answer.
There is an answer in this knowledge plane of the question "Who am I?", Which is what the self, the name, the identity, the nationality, the culture, the ideology,
What more?
What's that croc job doing here? The question is with the answer now.
An answer to a pile problem such as "What is time?"
We all said ...!
Now this knowledge has entered the process of producing its own material and its own knowledge.
(This is even more important)
What, does the information produce material?
Yes, the essence of existence is knowledge and matter is its product.
The matter that emerges from the wisdom also produces its own knowledge. (Yes, this part is a little stake, accept)
This motion is like breathing. Every breath you give is dying, you're reborn with every breath you take.
Again information is formed, the substance is formed again, and the substance of the escape is proceeding to fill the matter.
There is a plane in which this movement of information-substance relation is the moment, which is time.
Therefore, knowledge takes material as a product in time, evolutionistly translates the life of the material into a systematic fiction (let us call it 'legend') and present it.
Yes, it is a 'present'.
This is like a vow of knowledge.
It is, of course.
In this context, a legend is presented to the legend.
It is possible for a person to read life as a tragedy.
(Because human beings live in that myth)
The mind, which has passed from the stage of comprehension to the stage of "knowing", is equipped with the awareness of being an object of knowledge, of its own, ie, of its own.
What more?
Wait, what is this?
The "time" in this new hardware is just that. Because the process of formation of the material involves a linear flow (history-chronology), which belongs to the past and occurs and comes out at the same time.
(Which is also important)
This is a step after the implementation.
You will say "man is building himself, entity is making his own knowledge, what is not this practice?"
It seems right from an angle, but it is not.
The application is the process of creating the new time and its new material.
The story that we know afterwards is an existent, an absent and
I am dedication to ninety-five tinny mine shakes ...
