So its been a rather busy couple of weeks, with the releases of Relevancy, then Agnes, which shortly led to the release of additional enhancements or technology clones into Relevancy from Agnes, we’ve also been hearing some great feedback on Agnes, along the lines of 20 pips, 7pips, 14pips etc in gains from utilizing within their own due, which is also great seeing people earn their subscription fees for the year back so quickly, so its safe to say our products are having an impact for those that utilize within their own experience and knowledge points.
Likewise, Relevancy continues to gain users, however, this last week has been more about showcasing Lucid as it enters from a system module on our servers into our internal data center (Mavis) and the wrap up of the various consoles for users to interact with.
Over the next few months as these products come fully online there will be a constant feed to social media or the like, which will create a lot of exposure, specifically in light of automated SEC reporting being implemented for Crypto Promoters whereby deception is picked up, they went silent on INV, we’re only too glad to bang the drums on them and allow our technology to weed out the few rotten apples in the cart, likewise politicals under Lincoln will continue to be pushed out with all forms of interviews, discussions, addresses, speeches etc being analysed, which interestingly perked up the interest of a party ahead of a upcoming election, that has reached out about the utilising this technology, but more on that if it passes from the very early based chit chat discussions later, but for now a sign of potential interesting times ahead for Invacio and Invacians alike.
We’ve also got Madoff which is specific to the financial markets, which will be interesting with a quarterly address on performance being captured and processed, likewise giving individual people the ability (or corporations) to establish an account and process their own visuals through Veritas on-demand via per-use billing with Credits, which again sets Invacio in good stead for some exposure ahead.
But for now, we will look at the following videos that were released this week, which you may have tweeted, retweeted, liked or shared, hopefully, watched! And give you a reason as to why Lucid can be very disruptive, perhaps a orchestrator of chaos?
So let's look at the first video (imagine this was 2018, at the time, near-realtime).
These are the sort of things you would be considering with the intelligence derived by lucid as this news cycle after cycle broke the internet or tv.
For others, this is where you see an opportunity for financial gain, as its chaos, just need to find the patterns, translate them and take advantage of an opportunity.
There were a lot of allegations that Trump, through Cambridge Analytica was in bed with the Russians, pretty much anything to do with Trump was involved in the Russians, what you may not be aware, is that one of the founder’s of Cambridge Analytica is none other than Robert Mercier, for those that have read this till now, then you hopefully also know that Robert Mercier was also the co-CEO for Renaissance Technologies, if you don’t realize who they are then you really should research, they are after all one of the best performing hedge funds in the world they pioneered what is essentially ANI (AI) & Quant in many respects, they manage ‘employee’ funds which are some 60 BILLION dollars, and they make a lot of money in the downturns, they essentially utilize artificial intelligence to read the market and act on and have done so in various guises since their inception, now why is this important? Well because Cambridge Analytica and Renaissance Technologies are essentially the same, the big difference is one organization harvests information and its then used for marketing/manipulation as in how Cambridge Analytica aided the Trump 2016 campaign, the other organization, harvests the information and derives and projects then enacts trades in the markets on.
Same shovel different patch of earth.
Which I guess is what you could describe invacio like, excluding the billions of play money and Ph.D.’s, traders and swish offices, mind our website is a bit snazzier.
Now going back to the video itself, there were these allegations that Cambridge Analytica was involved with Russians, Alexander Nix (CEO) was called in for a meeting to explain himself (the company) to the British Government (as a British organization).
GSR Involvement = No Deception
Worked in Russia, or worked on behalf of Russian organisations = No DeceptionRelationship
with Russian organizations or individuals = No Deception
Well, that wraps that up.
Moving on there was then the allegations that Trump was putting pressure on the former Director of the NSA, Adm. Michael S Rogers to which there was a hearing on this case.
Inexperience is it typical that the president (Trump) would ask questions or bring up a FBI investigation into associates related to Trump = Adm. Michael S Rogers, immediate deception, but relatively speaking this is specific to the statement he was and then spoke which was directly related to expressing he would not be speaking about any theoretical, but not about the allegation/query from the bench to which he made it abundantly clear within his “the following comment”, that in the 3+ years he had been in position, he had never been directed (by a sitting president ?) to do anything he considered illegal, unethical, or immoral, further that during that period he had never felt pressured to do so, at which point there is deception.
I believe this then clearly outlines that Trump has not enquired as to the investigations, further he has not pressurized Adm. Michael S Rogers to complete anything that is illegal, immoral, or unethical, which then begs the question as to WHO has tried to pressurise him, again after this the speaker narrowed in on “whether Trump” had enquired or pressurized him, to which the deception again has not shown in his responses, this reconfirming earlier statements and derived pointers within the feed.
So who is pressuring the former Director of the NSA is the question we come away from this if we were using this for actionable intelligence in a financial objective, or in a investigative point of view ?
I trust this narrows on this element the remaining video was Trump and the lack of deception, sheer confidence in his statement and body, are certainly visible.
There is no denying that Trump has made many enemies and that he certainly is not perfect, and certainly has done many wrongs, potentially has narcissistic traits and believes with impunity in what he states, but this is the story we are fed time and time again, I think the real story is here, that many people have used commercial or personal associations to attack President Trump, then tried to paint them (the parties) in a bad light to stick mud around Trump, then they’ve come out and accused trump directly of wrongdoings (i.e former NSA Director), that would or could be considered illegal, immoral or unethical, yet all have come back clean in regards to the parties, or Trump indirectly or directly, but there is an obvious pattern here, that there is a clear attack, but besides that, if we are to trust the outcome of the derived intelligence that someone potentially has tried to pressurize the former Director of the NSA, who, who knows, the public ? The media ? Or something more sinister ?
https://www.invnews.blog/whos-pressuring-the-former-director-of-the-nsa?source=share-invacio
Posted by SiBo