Lord and Ladies, I have once again returned to share the fruit of my search for truth. You might remember my recent post in which I raised questions about the prominent serpentine symbolism surrounding the Vatican and its Audience Hall.
<
I had found a number of symbolic references to the serpent within the architecture of the hall in which the Pope holds his speeches, including the fact that the Papal leader stands between the two fangs in the mouth of the apparent snake, perhaps representative of him being the voice of the serpent.
I decided to research this issue further, and what I have found is of great significance. I would like to share those findings, and incite discussion as to whether or not the Catholic church has been usurped by Satanical forces.
There is a long-held but little-known theory revolving around accusations of Pope Paul VI being replaced by an imposter at the beginning of his reign in 1963.
In the image above, the man on the left is believed to be the original Paul VI, whilst the man on the right is said to the imposter. When viewing this image, although I am able to see some differences between the two, I found that I could see some similarities between the pair,. In other comparisons I could also see some facial features that appeared to be indicative of both photos being the same man. I wondered if the dissimilarity I was noticing were merely a result of the natural aging process.
The theory offers another explanation for the commonalities I am able to observe between the men in the comparison;
The impostor Pope had small green eyes. Paul VI had larger and very clear blue eyes..
During the Spring of 1977, a color photo of the impostor Pope was sent to Germany. It showed definite signs of plastic surgical operations done to him. He was a little cross-eyed and the left eyebrow dropped too low. His hands and his fingers--like his face--were rather broad and clumsily formed. His face was rounded, fleshy, his nose short, and the upper half of his ears extended outward.
I find that this could certainly explain what I am seeing, if the imposter underwent plastic surgery to look more like the man he was playing the role of. Something like this would be very difficult in today's world, given that we live in the time of internet and there are countless photos and videos of just about anyone of importance in the world. Back then, however, there was no internet, and access to information was a lot more limited. I feel this gives some credence to theory, as there would be a lot more chance of the Pope being replaced without enough people in the world being aware of it to make the necessary noise to bring attention to the deception.
Having remained unconvinced, I dug a little deeper into the history of the Catholic church.
A secondary theory asserts that the usurping of the Catholic church actually took place on October 26, 1958. On this day, an election was held to determine who would be the next Pope. Whilst everyone awaited the results from outside the Vatican, white smoke was signaled from the Vatican for as long as five minutes-- a message which speaks to the election being a success, and a new Pope being chosen.
This news went out all over the world after the witnessing of the white smoke, however, no new Pope appeared on the balcony as was customary at such an occasion. Instead, a few hours later, the Vatican released the news that no Pope had actually been selected and it was but a mere mistake, something that had never happened before this day.
The man who was expected to be elected as the Pope was Cardinal Siri, a man who the previous Pope had advised was the right person for the job. Father Malachi Martin, an ex Jesuit priest who renounced his vows after seeing the direction the church was heading in, claims in one of his books that Cardinal Siri was elected, but resigned under threat to him and his family.
The man that was elected later that day instead was Angelo Roncalli, who chose the name John XXIII (note the choice of the number 23). The theory states that this was the moment that the freemasons, whom do have a liking for the number 23, infiltrated the Roman Catholic church.
John XXIII's Masonic initiation is described in detail in Pier Carpi's book the "The Prophecies of John XXIII" and there is a vast amount of evidence and testimony that he was indeed a Mason. For this alone he would be ipso facto excommunicated and obviously ineligible for the Papacy. Upon his election, he immediately made Montini (future Paul VI) a Cardinal and called the Second Vatican Council, two of the most disastrous decisions in the history of the Catholic Church.
There is a lot more to both theories, and I encourage you to go look into them for yourself. I find it interesting, however, that there are two theories, seemingly with a lot of evidence, that speak to the same result.
Father Malachi Martin is also an interesting source of information relating to the Usurping of the Catholic church. He states in one his books that there was a Satanic ceremony celebrating the new direction of the Church.
"Most frighteningly for [Pope] John Paul [II], he had come up against the irremovable presence of a malign strength in his own Vatican and in certain bishops’ chanceries. It was what knowledgeable Churchmen called the ‘superforce.’ Rumors, always difficult to verify, tied its installation to the beginning of Pope Paul VI’s reign in 1963. Indeed Paul had alluded somberly to ‘the smoke of Satan which has entered the Sanctuary’. . . an oblique reference to an enthronement ceremony by Satanists in the Vatican. Besides, the incidence of Satanic pedophilia—rites and practices— was already documented among certain bishops and priests as widely dispersed as Turin, in Italy, and South Carolina, in the United States. The cultic acts of Satanic pedophilia are considered by professionals to be the culmination of the Fallen Archangel’s rites."
I found this all very interesting, and as demonstrated by the legitimate photograph of me above where I am deeply immersed in thought, I began to think on something I have not seen covered within any of these theories.
The pizzagate revelations have revealed to us that child abuse, for those in Satanic circles, is about far more than a perverse quest for self-gratification. The sexual abuse is ritual in nature, with the abusers believing--whether they are right or not-- that they are extracting energy, often referred to as low-vibrational energy, from their victims. The sick fuckers believe that they are drawing some type of power though these despicable acts, and as such I began to wonder..
We have all grown up amidst prevalent allegations of the Catholic church abusing your boys. Notably, the stories always seem to refer to the Catholic church specifically. With this new theory of a Satanic coup d'etat in mind, I conducted a search for the earliest instances of child abuse in the Roman Catholic church.
Wikipedia informs us that;
The accusations began to receive wide publicity in the late 1980s.
75% of the allegations in the United States were of abuse between 1960 and 1984.
From this I feel that we can establish a timeline for when the sexual abuse of young boys started to become a common occurrence within the Catholic church. The 1960's is when both theories state that the church began to become overrun by Satanic practitioners, and as such, this could be the reason for why the sexual(which could now also be ritual) abuse began. It's also worth considering that the church constantly being accused of paedophilia is a huge motivator for people disbelieving in God, which according to the one of the theories, was the goal of the freemason infiltration.
Finally, I would also like to add that the serpentine audience hall was constructed in 1970. Taking the architectural planning side of things into account, this implies that the design work for the building began in the 60's when Satan worshipers apparently stole the Papal throne.
