"...........The felony charges against the Center for Medical Progress have been pursued by pro-choice politicians, such as former California Attorney General Kamala Harris and current state Attorney General Xavier Becerra. Harris has received huge campaign donations from the abortion industry in the past, including more than $81,000 from Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocacy groups. As California’s attorney general, Harris chose not to investigate the illegal activities of Planned Parenthood. Instead, she had her office search Daleiden’s home to seize his laptop and the hard drives that contained video footage of his investigation........."
On Septermber 9th there was a 5th video released in which it was clear that body parts had set prices. This is by every definition a well organized BUSINESS.
The "Mass Media" however refuses to over the facts that POLITICIANS from a certain POLITICAL PARTY have been given "CAMPAIGN DONATIONS" by Planned Parenthood.
The "Mass media" refuses to cover the fact that the investigative journalism is being taken to court and is being JUDGED, while the SELLING OF BODY PARTS FOR MONEY without any consent from both or either of the parents is being thrown into the background. As if it is not happening.
In fact the "Mass Media" has attempted to "justify" this business practice from all sorts of angles.
I wonder, How much do these organizations that sell body parts without any consent from the parents spend on air time to promote their "humane & moral services" via the "mass media"?
Here comes the punchline that seems to be being twisted in the mass media, from what I can see.
This of course, understandably evokes a lot of reactions from those who oppose abortion.
Facts being brought to light, such as:
"Sandra Merritt's undercover investigation, conducted with her colleague David Daleiden, uncovered evidence that some babies are still alive when their organs are harvested. "
StemExpress CEO admits selling beating baby hearts, intact baby heads in Daleiden-Merritt hearing
While reading all these alt media sources, that are not funded by any of 'The Deep State' (tax payers money), the question that pops to mind is the following:
Isn't clinical death a flatline?
So what exactly are we dealing with here?
From what I see this is all comparable to the evils that we as humans classified as NEVER TO BE ALLOWED AGAIN!
ref:
The sale of body parts without consent from both (or either) parents.
Funding political campaigns with "profits".
The "mass media" ignoring all the facts that are above and beyond disturbing.
The judicial system and the politicians involved (those that received $$$$$$$ for their campaigns) wanting to convict the people who brought all these facts to light with undeniable evidence.
?????????????????????????
What implications does all this have on the "free" and "democratic" world?
What precedence does all this set?
Is experimenting on beating hearts and brains etc. justified under any of the above described, proven and admitted to in court situations?
Is it possible that what is being touched upon here has a lot more behind it than what meets the eye?
After all, we are looking at 100% proven information and facts, all admitted to in court. We are seeing, rather 'not seeing' anything in the "mainstream media", which is disturbing, especially as "investigative journalism" is being put to trial under all sorts of different labels.
The questions I ask here are all based on the facts, not 'opinion' but cold hard facts.
The question I ask again, but this time directly:
If investigative journalism, the quest to get the truth out into the light of day is being put to trial and if the persons who achieved this quest for truth are CONVICTED FOR IT,
THEN WHAT CAN WE EVER EXPECT OR BELIEVE FROM ANY OF THE MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS OUT THERE?
It is alarming, to say the least.
This post is a continuation on the post from yesterday:
As I commented on the thread in that post:
"The deeper a person goes into it, the "deep state" seems to become more of a reality!"
& now I touched upon the precedents and implications that follow in the "free" and "democratic" world.
Again, I reiterate:
"Please go out there and see for yourself what the 'freedom of speech' means to those who hold power and influence in the key institutions.
This is way too serious to let it pass without the information being made available and open to the people."
