Your thesis statement is patently false. There are no "US-funded" bio-labs.

This comment is patently absurd. I linked to the source documents and web pages of the relevant agencies that prove U.S. funding.

There are four main reasons why the theory of "oh, the US is making bio-weapons in these labs" theory doesn't even come close to making what passes for sense in the Kremlin's usual propaganda.

Well that's cool because I never said that bioweapons were being made in these labs. In fact, I stated:

The publicly expressed concern from U.S. officials – in addition to the previous statements about biolab capabilities and the materials that may be stored in them – and the stated purposes of these labs, according to international agreements and the agencies overseeing them, suggests that at least one high-security lab in Ukraine may hold extremely dangerous pathogens and/or old Soviet-era bioweapons that have not yet been destroyed. These pathogens and/or Soviet-era bioweapons could be acquired, leaked or otherwise broken from containment, or deliberately used by either Ukraine or Russian forces during the course of their current conflict.

This is not speculation. We have a factual, documented record of these labs and apparent legitimate concern from the U.S. government that a catastrophic event could occur with the materials at the labs which, based on the evidence, could include bioweapons.

This does not mean that the labs in Ukraine are currently researching and creating new bioweapons. Those accusations have been vehemently denied by the United States and Ukraine and they claim that operations are open to scrutiny by various national and international agencies and institutes.

I didn't bother reading the rest of your comment since it was obvious that you never bothered reading what I wrote or checking the provided source material for yourself.

Thanks for stopping by.