Many videos like this one have been recommended to people by YouTube these days.

The main idea is to replace politicians to reduce political inefficiency, e.g. media manipulation, low voting participation rate, and corruption.

Why it's bad?

In this video, like many other TED talks, the idea is to use AI to automatically vote for you based on what you'd vote on your own. But in their explanations, they say we'd be voting on some bills that we don't understand. My question is: isn't it dangerous to vote without understanding what we're signing up for first? Do you trust the AI that mysterious people design for you? When they tell you you should trust them throwing a mountain of certificates, will you?

AI is good, ONLY when it is designed and programmed by your own hands, through learning Tensorflow, downloading and feeding data, observing the progressive learning curve, and testing if the bot will do what you want it to do, by yourself. It's a bad idea to trust someone else's AI on politics.

What alternative do I suggest?

SteemIt's dPoll! Instead of letting them throw me a bunch of things I don't understand and leaving the AI I'm given to vote for me, I'd rather vote on my own on the bill on dPoll. If it's something we don't understand, it can be attached with explanation and let the people validate it to make it credible. This bill will then be immutably, permanently, openly, borderlessly, and uncensorably on the blockchain in the future. That's better than the AI solution.

If you agree with me, please upvote and resteem it, so as to compete with TED talkers of this field and also to promote SteemIt. MUCH APPRECIATED!!

THE TED VIDEO