Want To Know What is Happening in the World? Then Read this Book of the Guy Who Created Al-Qaeda

If you want to know why the fuck the Muricans are messin' with the Ukraine and are sending new cannonfodder to Afghanistan and why they have been blowing the Middle East to pieces for decades, why they created 'Al-Qaeda' and 'ISIS' half a globe away from Murica? You need to read the words of the Forces of Evil themself.

Read It Here:

http://www.takeoverworld.info/Grand_Chessboard.pdf

A good aricle on the Brzezinski doctrine

(left out the Kingdom BS)

He saw America emerging as the sole superpower. He said,

"The last decade of the twentieth century has witnessed a tectonic shift in world affairs. For the first time ever, a non-Eurasian power has emerged not only as a key arbiter of Eurasian power relations but also as the world's paramount power. The defeat and collapse of the Soviet Union was the final step in the rapid ascendance of a Western Hemisphere power, the United States, as the sole and, indeed, the first truly global power." (p. xiii)

He was saying that for the first time in history, “a non-Eurasian power”—meaning the US government—is in control of Eurasia (i.e., Russia). This, of course, was the goal. He also warned against a loss of control, which he said “would produce massive international instability” and probably “global anarchy.”

"America's withdrawal from the world or because of the sudden emergence of a successful rival - would produce massive international instability. It would prompt global anarchy." (p. 30)

He goes on to speak of the enormous oil and natural gas in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, which were former southern Soviet Republics. It is obvious that Brzezinski sought for US control of those resources in order to “ensure that no single power [Russia or China] comes to control this geopolitical space.”

"It follows that America's primary interest is to help ensure that no single power comes to control this geopolitical space and that the global community has unhindered financial and economic access to it." (p. 148)

He continues,

"America is now the only global superpower, and Eurasia is the globe's central arena. Hence, what happens to the distribution of power on the Eurasian continent will be of decisive importance to America's global primacy and to America's historical legacy." (p. 194)

In other words, America has to restrain rivals like Russia and China from emerging as powers in Eurasia. We wonder how America could ever hope to win such a conflict, when Russia and China are so close to that area of the world, while America is half a world away! Seen in reverse, that would be the equivalent of Russia trying to have Mexico under its hegemonic sphere of influence.

"That puts a premium on maneuver and manipulation in order to prevent the emergence of a hostile coalition that could eventually seek to challenge America's primacy." (p. 198)

"The most immediate task is to make certain that no state or combination of states gains the capacity to expel the United States from Eurasia or even to diminish significantly its decisive arbitration role." (p. 198)

In other words, the US has to “make certain” that a coalition between Russia and China is unable to diminish US oil and gas interests in Eurasia.

Ukraine’s Strategic Importance

On page 46 of his book, Brzezinksi shows the importance of Ukraine in the US strategy to retain control of Eurasia:

Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard, is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire. Russia without Ukraine can still strive for imperial status, but it would then become a predominantly Asian imperial state, more likely to be drawn into debilitating conflicts with aroused Central Asians, who would then be resentful of the loss of their recent independence and would be supported by their fellow Islamic states to the south. China would also be likely to oppose any restoration of Russian domination over Central Asia, given its increasing interest in the newly independent states there. However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as its access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia. Ukraine's loss of independence would have immediate consequences for Central Europe, transforming Poland into the geopolitical pivot on the eastern frontier of a united Europe.

In other words, Ukraine has the potential of making Russia a Eurasian power, but if Ukraine keeps its “independence,” i.e., if the US can wrench Ukraine out from under Russia into the hegemony of the US government, then Russia will remain an Asian power, not a Eurasian power.

This was why the US plotted the coup in Kiev, and this is partly why Russia objects. Russia had invested a lot in Ukraine, putting in pipelines to supply Europe with natural gas and oil. The US became alarmed that Russia was becoming a Eurasian power, linking Europe to Asia, and thereby diminishing US hegemony in the region.

Brzezinski’s book shows that he considered Russia to be the main US competitor for natural resources and had to be contained in order to maintain the US status as the “sole superpower.” On page 47 he says,

Can Russia be both powerful and a democracy at the same time? If it becomes powerful again, will it not seek to regain its lost imperial domain, and can it then be both an empire and a democracy? U.S. policy toward the vital geopolitical pivots of Ukraine and Azerbaijan cannot skirt that issue, and America thus faces a difficult dilemma regarding tactical balance and strategic purpose. Internal Russian recovery is essential to Russia's democratization and eventual Europeanization. But any recovery of its imperial potential would be inimical to both of these objectives.

In other words, he claims to want Russia to become democratic and Europeanized, but does not want Russia to regain any power as a superpower that might rival that of the US. The rise of Putin, Russia’s strong leader, was thus seen as a threat to the power of the US in Eurasia.

The problem is that US opposition came to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Putin tried at first to become a European state, but the US balked at that and began to treat him as an enemy. So Putin turned East and strengthened ties with China. At the same time, though, Putin does see itself as the bridge between Europe and Asia, and, in fact, can hardly avoid it, given its geographical position. The US is the isolated power, being geographically positioned between two oceans. The two oceans have served as a good defense in the past, but insofar as trade is concerned, its position has some disadvantages.

The point is that Ukraine has been a key pawn in “The Grand Chessboard.” Ukrainians are dying because of it. Their lives are being disrupted. Whether the US is justified or not in its political coup last year depends on the moral basis of one’s strategy. As the beast world thinks, where “might makes right” and nations function according to their own selfish interests, there is no moral code at all. Only hegemony is important, so that nations can benefit from the labor and resources of other nations.

https://gods-kingdom-ministries.net/daily-weblogs/2015/02-2015/the-brink-of-war/