Thank you for your contribution to Utopian. This is a very promising project, and it's good to see all the progress being made. You managed to compose an interesting blog post that contains useful information about the project. Keep up the good work.
On the content side, this was a mixed bag for me. Even though I like all the information provided, I have to admit that I wanted to read a bit more about the project itself. I also wanted to read more about your personal knowledge, views and experience with the project. Nevertheless, the post is extensive, and includes general information related to the purpose of this project.
That said, the post did have minor proofreading issues, but not to the level where it hurt the reading experience. Furthermore, the post contains too many short paragraphs, which makes it hard for the readers to get a flavour of the key points for the whole text. Your paragraphs should be at least four to six sentences long, and each paragraph should discuss one main, identifiable idea.
It is also worth noting that you forgot to add the link to the github repository for this project, but I did some research and found it.
In conclusion, this is a nice contribution from you, and I apreciate the information you have provided us with. I look forward to your next contribution.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
RE: PROJECTEER: Analysis Of The Future Of Project Funding Through Content Creation On The Steem Blockchain