Total 62 Contributions on graphics category
44 Contributions upvoted by Utopian.io account
15 Contributions was tied to a Utopian task request
1 Contribution selected as Staff Pick
| Thumbnail | Info |
|---|---|
 | My Utopy contribution (TaskRequest) tobaloidee · 14 votes · 5 comments · $134.8 |
 | Utopy Mascot and Avatar Design for Utopian zoltarian · 39 votes · 18 comments · $78.6 |
 | New Logo For What Todo zularizal · 16 votes · 5 comments · $130.1 |
 | Utopian Mascot design [Task request] moenawar · 18 votes · 9 comments · $102.3 |
 | Utopy Mascot Design for Utopian ivannewgate89 · 12 votes · 6 comments · $86.7 |
 | Mascot Design Proposal for Utopy ( The Utopian Mascot ) loydjayme25 · 13 votes · 3 comments · $94.5 |
 | Utopian Mascot Design I by @jason04 jason04 · 87 votes · 17 comments · $79.6 |
 | New Avatar Proposal for Utopy jbeguna04 · 40 votes · 3 comments · $105.2 |
 | Creating Utopy - The Utopian Mascot bitstreamer · 9 votes · 7 comments · $64.95 |
 | Utopian Mascot design [Task request] amirdesaingrafis · 53 votes · 3 comments · $82.30 |
 | Utopy - Utopian Mascot Proposal blankrained · 10 votes · 6 comments · $93.14 |
 | Utopian Mascot Design [Utopy] midun · 56 votes · 2 comments · $83.09 |
 | Responsive Mascot Design For Utopian podanrj · 126 votes · 75 comments · $207.30 Staff Picked |
 | Hero Mascot Contribution for Utopian.io dimensco · 29 votes · 24 comments · $97.31 |
 | New Logo For Maps Measure amirdesaingrafis · 62 votes · 7 comments · $119.89 |
 | Utopy - Mascot for utopian is a cute robot-cat. fabiyamada · 64 votes · 28 comments · $122.69 |
 | New Mascot Design for Utopy karmachela · 35 votes · 17 comments · $98.72 |
 | HesabFun Design Proposals ( Accepted and Merged ) loydjayme25 · 25 votes · 6 comments · $106.83 |
 | Modern logo for SoundSwitch linade · 30 votes · 4 comments · $130.03 |
 | Swank logo design realinfo · 36 votes · 10 comments · $127.63 |
 | LifeCalendar New Logo batarian71 · 23 votes · 3 comments · $121.63 |
 | Logo for RydeBot hafiza143 · 33 votes · 7 comments · $108.77 |
 | My Icon-Logo Contribution for "FlipCam" of Koushick123 tobaloidee · 22 votes · 6 comments · $97.64 |
 | Design Contribution of Orca Steem Avatar [Accepted by PO] dimensco · 30 votes · 10 comments · $122.89 |
 | My Logo for Piano Keyboard nunojesus · 24 votes · 7 comments · $115.65 |
 | Logo design contribution for Cryptowatch ihtiht · 14 votes · 5 comments · $69.95 |
 | Freetube Logo/Icon Proposal(Accepted & Merged) jbeguna04 · 15 votes · 8 comments · $97.82 |
 | My Design – Logo Proposal - For Fetch chimzycash · 13 votes · 3 comments · $79.51 |
 | My Icon-Logo Contribution to FAKER tobaloidee · 21 votes · 4 comments · $119.56 |
 | Catherine New Logo design masudrana · 23 votes · 5 comments · $75.76 |
 | New Logo & Notification Icon for Epubator yasujizr · 111 votes · 5 comments · $119.28 |
 | Logo Design For Note zularizal · 87 votes · 3 comments · $93.74 |
 | Awesome Podcast New Logo batarian71 · 14 votes · 3 comments · $82.03 |
 | MobileBuildTools logo design realinfo · 28 votes · 4 comments · $77.96 |
 | My Logo for Record-Player nunojesus · 54 votes · 5 comments · $82.57 |
 | My Icon-Logo contribution to "PINKYBAR" (requested by PO) tobaloidee · 36 votes · 3 comments · $118.82 |
 | Logo Proposal for PianoBooster nunojesus · 30 votes · 3 comments · $119.34 |
| https://steemitimages.com/240x0/https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipfs/QmePKoMWzvBoYypCMYJZu6QyNkVWNq794DV2ojZQwmz7uq | Logo Design for Bimba tebriz · 14 votes · 7 comments · $64.68 |
 | Logo Design Contribution for Gplanner ihtiht · 17 votes · 4 comments · $96.93 |
 | Logo Design For Mobell zularizal · 29 votes · 4 comments · $102.16 |
 | Nusic Logo/Icon Proposal(Accepted and Merged) jbeguna04 · 31 votes · 8 comments · $106.19 |
 | Logo Proposal for MusiQ App gabynnette · 18 votes · 5 comments · $102.91 |
 | New Logo for LEGATO stephenhawking · 14 votes · 4 comments · $104.14 |
 | Logo Design: ChatAnalyzer mugurcagdas · 17 votes · 9 comments · $104.18 |
Graphics Questionnaire
How many distinctive designs were provided? E.g., if the project owner requires 3 designs, then it is counted as a single distinctive design.
[1]More than 3 distinctive, relatively complex designs were provided.
[5]Between 2 and 3; the designs were complex and took a fair amount of work.
[37]Only one distinctive design was provided or the provided designs are too similar.
[1]Fewer than the project owner requested and/or the work invested was absolutely minimal.
Is the whole contribution a result of own work?
[37] Yes.
[0] Some third party assets were used but all of them are usable for the contribution actual purpose. The assets were accordingly edited and not simply downloaded and used.
[5] Other assets were provided by the project owner.
[1] Most assets used were third party assets and contributor did not make additional effort to incorporate them in the contribution.
One question was not answered on one of the reviews.
Did the contributor provide evidence of graphics consultation or other relevant kind of communication with the project owner?
[20]Yes. Communication was perfect.
[17]Yes, but communication was not professional or very detailed.
[6]No, but the contributor tried to reach out to the project owner.
[1]No, no communication happened OR there is evidence the user contacted the project owner on behalf of Utopian without permission.
Was the contribution used in the project? (ex.: the graphic design is already utilized in play store, project website or got merged into the official repository)
[22]Yes and the contributor provided clear evidence of it , and/or the project owner publicly announced that it will be used.
[11]It was not used, but the project owner liked it and considered using it.
[11]It was not used, but is of very high quality.
[0]It was not used as it provides no value to the project.
Does the contribution include files for immediate use in all requested formats?
[35]Yes, all required file formats were included.
[8]Most requested file formats requested by project owner were provided, but not all.
[1]No, submitted files were not ready for immediate use and require editing or adjustments.
[0]No files were provided.
Technical quality of graphics was:
[11]Excellent, no mistakes within the design.
[24]Very good with minor mistakes that are visible in the provided files.
[6]Good but the design has some more serious flaws that need to be corrected.
[3]Bad. The design does not follow graphics standard and is barely usable.
How would you describe the formatting, language and overall presentation of the post?
[7]The post is of very high quality.
[28]The post is of decent quality, but not spectacular in any way.
[6]The post is poorly written and/or formatted, but readable.
[3]The post is really hard to read and the content is barely understandable
How would you rate the overall value of this contribution on the open source community and ecosystem?
[1]This contribution brings great and impactful value, and can be used for applications outside the specific project.
[4]This contribution adds significant value to the open source community and ecosystem, or is of critical importance to the specific project.
[35]This contribution adds some value to the open source community and ecosystem or is only valuable to the specific project.
[4]This contribution adds nearly no value to the open source community and ecosystem or the specific project.