Hey riyanda,
Thank you for your contribution. I appreciate your work and zeal in promoting an open source project like Gimp. Gimp is a great project. It is one of the popular graphics software in the open source world, and I am glad to read reviews about its efficacy.
That said, I think the post is a little bit problematic. This post is not informative, nor well-written, and the structure does not look catchy. Although, I appreciate the experiences you shared about the contest, and how you used Gimp to take part. However, the blog category isn't just for information; we want and prioritize quality written. The post had severe grammar issues, and I'd be happy to cite examples in a follow-up comment.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
RE: Reviewing GIMP (part4): Science of photo manipulation.