Recent Mumps Outbreaks around the USA & Canada are NOT because of the unvaccinated,
... but rather because of the MUMPS portion of the MMR failure!
Furthermore, there are several genotypes of mumps that could be circulating.
PLEASE Watch This 3-Minute Video Clip
BUSTED! FORMER MERCK SCIENTISTS BLOW THE WHISTLE ON MMR VACCINE
... or Click Here To Watch on Youtube
Court Doc. http://www.rescuepost.com/files/june-mumps-suit-1.pdf
more info here: http://humansarefree.com/2016/09/lawsuit-merck-faked-mumps-vaccine.html
If you look at the filed court document above, you will see that Merck Pharmaceutical has been sued for faking the mumps portion of the MMR Vaccine to make it look like a 95% efficacy rate, in order to trick the government into giving them the sole patent on this vaccine in the USA.
So now the media is reporting that the mumps portion of the MMR Vaccine has an 85% efficacy rate with 2 doses. It seems to me that a 15% admitted failure rate is pretty high! So that even if they got their desired 100% compliance on vaccination needed for their "herd immunity" theory, the low efficacy rate of the vaccine would never stop mumps outbreaks!
Yet the media drones on about how it is the fault of the Unvaccinated whenever mumps outbreaks occur.
Take for example this article which just appeared on Global News (Canada).
Global News Report: Mumps outbreak confirmed in Toronto, may have originated in west-end bars: officials
So 60% had either zero mumps vaccine or only 1 dose of the vaccine, and therefore "not fully protected."
That statement is very vague, and for all we know:
1 person was unvaccinated
7 had a single dose of vaccine
6 had two doses of the vaccine.
It is a common media tactic to lump the partially vaccinated in with the unvaccinated.
So who really makes up this "Not Fully Protected" group?
It is possible that 13 or the 14 people with mumps were considered up-to-date on their mumps vaccine as a child.
You see, doctors naively used to believe that a single dose of any vaccine kept you immune for your entire life.
Now however, we have learned that any immunity a vaccine may give is short-lived. While natural immunity usually lasts a life-time, vaccination wanes within 10 years.
See earlier my article here:
It wasn't until 1996 that Canada started giving 2 doses of the MMR (Measles/Mumps/Rubella) when they realized that one dose wasn't working sufficiently. So anyone older than 21-years may have had only a single MMR shot and thought that they were set for life. Only now do they discover that they are "not fully protected."
So basically, the older you get the more your vaccines wane, and the more susceptible you are to mumps or measles.
Now imagine this scenario .... a year from now they decide that 2 doses of MMR is not sufficient and add another 3rd booster. Then more mumps outbreaks happen and the media reports that 60% of the ill were "not fully protected" because they only had 2 vaccines.
And one day in the future, people who have 6 doses of mumps vaccine could be labelled "not fully protected" because the new recommendation is 7 doses. Just where does it stop?
When will everyone realize that the mumps vaccine (along with all the others) simply doesn't work NEARLY as well as Natural Immunity?
Will they ever stop blaming the unvaccinated every time the vaccine itself fails?
If a news article does not mention the number of unvaccinated at all in the article, you are probably safe to assume that NONE of the infected were unvaccinated. The media jumps at every chance to blame unvaccinated,
so if the they are silent it is because they don't want to make it obvious that only vaccinated people succumbed.
If you wish to learn more of the truth about Herd Immunity, try reading this excellent article below by Immunologist Tetyana Obukhanych, Ph.D.
http://pathwaystofamilywellness.org/Informed-Choice/herd-immunity.html
