Today is the holiday that forced ascetics, incels, and some religious groups hate most. A holiday that symbolizing an attachment we will never have, or a sinful depravity that is more fitting as a pagan fertility ritual in nature than it is about st valentine. Advocacy groups of course mock it even further calling it venereal disease day as they pass out b/c. They don't know what love is, but they know how to be an animal and provide revenues to planned parenthood when those intentionally fail. Yup, they give out the worst in the market.
It is a very painful holiday to those forced into isolation, especially in forced ascetics where the celebration of it is inescapable such as schools and universities. A very captive audience. Last year about this time there was a valentines day massacre, but other than incel groups it seems none tried to connect the two events. Many of the people, prior to Eliot Rogers, doing these things were gifted at math and/or computers. The Rise of Rogers and those that followed were just an omninous sign things were about to get worse, and indeed they did. The pre-Rogers group knew that they were better than others, had a greater income potential than their competition, but the social scales were tilted against them. Something unnatural is happening, where the most fit have become the least fit and their reward for working hard and achieving and following all therules only lead to a life of discrimination, bullying, increasing loneliness and isolation. Anyways, Typically such massacres are in in April, just shy of graduation. April 20th is chosen typically as a symbol of another man who was never good enough for a woman with a jewish sounding name, who would later rise to power wanting to create a superior race and eugenics. Was Hitler autistic? Kind of difficult to say, but there are arguments that could be made for it in his younger years. However, given the studies by hans Asperger's, kids with autism would make poor Nazi's-as asperger's sent a few kids to the death camps. He knew they wouldn't make good NAZIs even if they were superior intellectually....even if one of them did become a professor in astronomy who found a flaw in Newton's theories. So It appears there are some rules autistic people can't follow, in pursuing our own interest, we can't become Nazis unlike you normal people. Loneliness is a silent killer, that just doesn't lead to heart disease and tumors. It likely can unlock autism to clinical levels from people who are otherwise normal. It draws out the desire, especially for the gifted, to try to change the world in a light favorable to their caste. How important forming attachments are, if they be created could Nazi Germany have been averted? I suppose that requires a more serious academic study of pre-Nazi Germany than century delayed musings, it could have still happened with a different leader. But certainly most school massacres could be avoided. There is something more relevant about april and later massacres, it represents an end. This was the society that they grew up in, they failed to develop any meaningful attachments to go forward in life in. Their next stages in life, be it work or college, restarting the whole process even more isolated...until finally in the work place where there is a void and an end of virtually all opportunities. The failure to establish permanent relationships at this stage of life is a sense of impending doom, many die to create hope for others, and the suicide rate amoung autistic teens is abnormally high as they continue to suffer from chronic loneliness. Those who try to peacefully achieve to create hope for others, well....they get arrested, thrown in jail, and starved. You can thank judge Eleanor Ross who basically ruled that the only proper channel to address the inequalities is not speech, reason, and achievements-But through massacres. It is a hard reality to swallow but a reality she created to protect her feminist ideology. It is what it is, a federal judge has declared war against the people, and the congress has their heads stuck too far up their asses to really care.
In many ways the Male with asperger's represents the ideal man. He acts in his own rational self interest, he is smart, gifted, and uses reasons to achieve great things-even if it means doing complex things by himself instead of being slowed down by a team or group. Society tends to be cruel to him, he probably doesn't have a niche, so he doesn't handle social interactions normally. He has to establish what their motivations are; what are the other peoples intent is. And can come across as being cold when cutting to the chase, and not giving people a response they are seeking. They rigidly follow the rules and will rarely break them, and are extremely honests. How they view women is mixed case by case. The incel variety of any group tend to see screwing women as a way to finally fit in with the guys, but is no more despicable than one of the guys....Just Some people like Trump and Rogers are more openly honest about it. The forced ascetic, a cuck you could say, are the nice guys who want women as friends. They probably are more open to the concept of polyamory only because, supposing they did have a wife, they would be forced to tolerate her cheating at the detriment of being alone and the friendship is ultimately what matters. We don't judge our friends by who they sleep with, so why should I the person whom I married as my best friend. It seems awkward and outside of traditional norms, but life was already outside of the norm. They are literally being screwed over and exploited, but are at the mercy of reality that there is not exclusivity of the marriage. What they really want in its truest state, they may not really be able to achieve and are stuck in a less than compromising situation; They have nothing to negotiate with. Others would simply show the woman the door, these people can't. As much as women may say they want smart men, men who are kind to them, men who make a lot of money, men who are honest, men who love them for them and not interested in s3x. That is, for the most part, just a lie....well one part is true, less we forget the first occupation. The forced ascetic hates how his fellow man treats women, and hates how they treat them. Many make the mistake early in life of becoming feminists and adopt ideologies not to dissimilar to the mcdworkenites not understanding how any woman could consent to an act that results in a 9 month pregnancy and an 18 year obligation. It is confusing really, but hardwired less mankind goes extinct. Oh, there are cucks on both sides of the spectrum, the cucks on the right/libertarian side hopefully have identified the problem and how they are ensnared.
The cucks not only are the perfect men from an objectivist point of view, but they are the perfect men from a feminist perspective. But, these aren't the perfect men to what most women want that could compliment their the cucks needs. The cucks need someone special enough to break them out of their shell-the heavier they were bullied the deeper their shell. Sure there are women whose spirits are broken who will settle for a nice guy aka cuck, women who might screw Quasimodo for sanctuary. Quasimodo was a nice but deformed guy, and he likely starved to death embracing his Esmeralda after she was killed. So a cuck might have a relationship and inherit all of her problems, but he won't be anything special to her other than offering a safe space to crash for a while....but at least his worth is at least as much as Quasimodo. Something many won't achieve, even if violent gang members and drug dealers are actively sought after by women. Quite depressing for a gifted person to know how you rank in the American society.
The ideals most people say they want, aren't really what they really want because they aren't honest with themselves. Most people have to protect and project an image of themselves to be better than what they are, to sound better in some way, to market themselves....ways that aren't really them. They have to repress what they really want and live a double life, a life of lies, and escaping reality. Some people say this was why Donald trump won the election in 2016 on positions that weren't popular in years/decades, because he reached to what people were really thinking underneath the veneer of what the social justice warriors tried to limit our ideas too. Just a theory that's been raised by I think Paul Watson.
Recently some Yale students sued the university over the fraternity culture. They claimed they were groped, but I suppose that is hard to evidence. Hmm, how much money damages makes a woman whole who has been groped? Wait until you have a mammogram, then tell me about being groped and your expectations for compensatory damages. Easier for any woman to just claim to be a victim these days, and we are expected to believe them because believeallwomen without question. False allegations are easy to make, so my skepticism remains without hard evidence. There are honor societies and there are party societies, maybe some are mixed. People, especially women, who go to frat parties have a good idea of what they are getting into. They know of the hangovers, they know of waking up in strange places, they know of drunk s3x, they know of s3xual assaults, they been told to avoid them, they hear plenty of stories of the happenings including deaths from alcohol poisonings and hazings across the country. Alcohol gives them an excuse to put their veneer down, and up to the point where things become rape of an inebriated person, it gives them an excuse to be who they really want to be...and earn praised for what many would call bad judgment. It doesn't mean they want to be molested by just anyone, or drinking a lethal amount of booze, but they knowingly put themselves in an dangerous environment of drunk men many of whom may be inebriated and also have bad judgement....extremely bad judgement considering how easy false accusations are to make, and the presence of drunk women. Assuming it is true that frat parties live up to their public reputation, it is ridiculous for feminist to advocate teach men not to rape. If womew are unable to consent when they are drunk, can men be expected to know what to do and not do when they may be just as inebriated and devoid of judgement? Will feminist advocate that women stop going to frat parties, that woman stop dating muscle heads, that women make better decisions about the relationships they enter into, will they advocate for women not to get caught up in drugs and alcohol, will feminist start telling women to stop rewarding the bad guys? So many things Women can do stop s3xual assault by using a little common sense, but blame all men and reward the bad guys-the ways its been played for decades. Women are not faultless; They are drawn to muscle, they are drawn to risk, they are drawn to fantasy, they are drawn to bad boys, they are drawn to drugs and alcohol. They want the exact opposite of a strictly by the rules, no risk, mild mannered nerd. If they make a mistake, they pay planned parenthood to kill the baby. If they keep the baby, they collect 18 years of child support while living off another guy. There is wic, snap, welfare, section 8, ibr, charities, battered womens shelters, all to protect mostly women from their bad decisions. When it comes to s3xual assault at these parties, feminist don't want us to victim blame. When it comes to violence against women, feminist don't want us to blame their decisions in choosing men. They don't even want to look at a woman's sexual history either for which patterns of behavior could be used as a defense in court. Guilty by accusation, say they are guilty of rape because of regret after having s3x, accuse men of rape because you don't like their opinions, accuse them of rape to get back at an ex or excuse an affair, accuse a nerd off stalking for just saying hello. They willingly go to basically rape island without fear, then cry foul when a sexual assault does occur. The world is not perfect, reality is the court of final appeal. There are animals among us, and if you walk into a lions den...Don't blame the lion when he rips out your throat. It is in his nature. Oh, but what if you tame/train it not to kill? Not even professionals like siegfried and roy can defy their true nature forever. Now Roy Horn did try to argue that the tiger severed his jugular to save his life after a stroke, but animal experts disagree ("The cat wasn't trying to protect him," said Jonathan Kraft, who runs the Arizona-based nonprofit group Keepers of the Wild. "That was a typical killing bite."). People devise all sorts of delusion theories to try to ignore that reality is not a nice place; it is kill or be killed if necessary. We can't pretend it is never necessary to defend our lives or our bodies with lethal force. Oh, don't get me wrong, I can still blame women for bad decisions, and find a man guilty for performing the illegal act in a criminal suit. But in a civil suit, I would strongly consider comparative negligence. Perhaps that is what feminist don't want us to do when they say not to victim blame, they don't reduce the monetary damages that goes to the often feminist attorneys. The only riches to be made in gender studies are the practicing attorneys, and, depending on what you call riches, the professors as well. I have every right to call an idiot an idiot, faster than feminists would say the crocodyles were intolerant of this pastor's religion....actually, given that he was a christian pastor, they might call him an idiot too because of their selective outrage. If a woman doesn't like my attitude, she is more than welcome to attend all the frat parties she wants and hopefully have an epiphany when she answers the question of when does the hurting stop? The answer is the obvious, don't put yourself at risk in the first place. If feminist don't like men who call women who dress up as sluts, as sluts. Well, therein lies your problem. You deny the basic axiom of identity that A Is A. Perhaps you just want women to feel good about being sluts, but it is what it is. Stop trying to ignore reality, and cover it up at the detriment of the rest of society.
There is a lot of merit on both men and woman waiting until marriage before doing naughty things. At my age there aren't too many women left who have waited this long, unless there is something seriously wrong with them either mentally or physically. Could the same be said of men who have waited this long? Many have become silicone valley execs, who realized what many others had 30 years prior. Waiting can demonstrate self control, forward thinking, intelligence, goal setting, financial control, it also suggest the attraction is for the person not their biological functions....though not to many people want to wake up next to ugly. These are all traits that should be sought in an ideal partner. It is rare to find such a woman, and because I am a forced ascetic I guess you could say it really doesn't matter to me despite my faith whether a woman is chaste or not. I just want my friend back, I don't want a woman for indecent things. Supposing my friend did accept me, there is nothing she could do that would allow me to willingly defile her. A deprivation of friendships in the adolescent years and knowledge of future loneliness I think causes this; the concept of a male seeking a woman as a best friend forever instead of others seeking a lover. it is confusing for the normal person to understand. Is a straight man being a BFF incompatible to what woman want? I lost my best friend forever soon after I asked her out. The cost is too high when the ultimate reward of asking a precious friend out was just a closer friendship, a life living struggling conflicted between the need of the friendship and the want of closeness. Something neither will be achieved by ordinary means, all while we hear about feminist b**** about how bad men are. The men who would amicably help women achieve their hopes and dreams are to be shunned and destroyed. Yeah Yeah yeah, you feminist just spoon feed your fellow women to these bad guys at our expense, and you scare women away from us with your anti-family propaganda that causes women to fear natural attachment styles. The obsession, last 6 months to 3 years, usually long enough to raise a child through infancy. The overvalued idea, where a partner cares about the other as a parent would his/her child undermines your argument so these men have to be destroyed too. You tell women to fear attachments, as you steer women into the hands of the uncaring hands of others who will ravage them, you who tell everyone to hate white men-especially the white and nerdy type. You who complain how famous women are just flashing pictures of their bums /uppers on instagram as if you ignored what christian conservatives argued, that women were being reduced to s3xual objects with your position on birth control and abortion, 2-3 decades ago. We were much smarter than you, we always have been, and always will be. The internet just managed to prove our side true to epic proportions, and now you cry foul because we told you so. Sure just destroy a woman's natural sense of modesty to the bad boys as a social norm, because you have turned women into s3xual objects and that is what is to be expected of women now these days. How sad, how pathetic, how disgusting. "The man who is proudly certain of his own value, will want the highest type of woman he can find, the woman he admires, the strongest, the hardest to conquer--because only the possession of a heroine will give him the sense of an achievement, not the possession of a brainless slut." Of course, forced ascetics aren't looking to possess a heroine, they are looking to be possessed by a heroine. One would think feminism would aspire more women to become heroines, but it is becoming a very rare trait. One would think feminist would would encourage women to pick men who seek to be possessed, men who would worship women, but they don't. They want women to transmute into animals, for the benefit of male animals, and make all mankind pay for it. Admit that what you want is a return to Spartan commune where men and women lived separately but under a modern Marxist flavor, and the communal raising of children. We, the men of the mind, are the slaves. We get it. I refuse, as should others.
Government rewards bad behavior at the expense of....achievers. Society basically redistributes the women away from the best men. And we wonder why men go crazy; we wonder why the male suicide rate is so high. We pretend to be ignorant when the incels start crying out for a redistribution of women. If would be great comedy if they weren't so serious, to use the tenants of marxism against the marxist feminists. But government has been redistributing the wealth and thus the direction of fertility for thousands of years. One culture reportedly done it right, the ashkenazi jews. Reportedly the wealthy would identify the gifted children, adopt them into their own families, and the gifted children would be more likely to live longer, attract mates, and spread their genes. That redistribution wasn't performed by force, it was done volitionally and likely had mutual benefits. Men were also expected to sell everything if they much to marry the daughter of a Torah Scholar, but to sleep with an unlearned person is to sleep with an animal-which is forbidden. Needless to say, Ashkenazi IQ is a whole standard deviation above the norm. Feminism: using the force of government to transmute all people into animals.
source: https://www.sefaria.org/Pesachim.49b.2?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en
source:full metal alchemist, ch 5. p 28.
Of the few people that I know, most of the men haven't dated/married American women. They don't like what feminist have turned American women into, they like the foreign cultures where women still place an importance on the family. There are still decent American Woman out there, but already claimed so to speak. They are a rare being. I don't know anyone who use tinder. But the explosion of the use of tinder, to mind, suggest men are more willing to commit to an std with some whore, than they are willing to commit to a woman in our society. A separation of men and women, except for conjugal purposes. How pathetic, and how sad,how lonely the American reality is becoming. American women have mostly become uncaring parasites that pretend to care about others while at their armchair trying to find new ways to steal money from achievers, outraging at anything the masses thinks should be outraged at. They'll sacrifice any man in the name of social justice, or get an 18 year annuity while sending the dad in and out of jail-all during that time bombard him with false accusations in a star chamber to deprive him of his right to see his kid. Do we wonder why it seems mostly gays are getting married these days, and the birth rates are dropping. Men are increasingly becoming psychologically castrated, or even having visectomies to escape the nightmare the feminist have established here. Many men want to develop deep attachments to a woman, but are scared they will just be sacrificed. What is going on in this country is unnatural. Women attack any autistic male that waves hello at a woman. They'll argue every guy is instantly guilty upon any accusation, even claiming a fear of a psychologically castrated male who eats soy products as to not harm even animals. oh, he dared speak to a woman by email, we're scared for our safety-quick lock him up because he isn't George Clooney. Meanwhile a likely client of that woman was arrested in Atlanta for a police standoff with a major cache of weapons. Also I think there is a photo of her doing a photo op with an nfl quarterback whom I think was accused of sexual assault in college. There are men out there who aren't bad guys, who seeks female companionship, but our culture is filled with toxic feminist ready to sacrifice the virgins, and the very ideal of what a man should be, to the volcanoes to appease their angry pagan God[desses]. And people wonder why so many Americans are alone,miserable, and dying. Feminism is the problem, it is a poison, it is a cancer.
We have a caste system in America, something I dare say will quickly exceed that of India's and whose cruelty will surpass that of Nazi Germany. All brought to you in the name of feminism, with a little help from Romans 13 antichrists on the 11th circuit. Some men, like creepy joe Biden, are well respected in society-no matter how poorly they treat women. In businesses and elsewhere in life, the top 20% does about 80% of the business. If you aren't in that upper 20% socially in society, then as a man you really have no place in society. Everything you hope to achieve will end up being extorted to further develop your own social prison. The top caste has somewhat been shaken up since the hollywood feminist turned against Harvey Weinstein, while the actresses got high paying acting gigs and hush money. Were they victims of s3xual assault or mere prostitutes who turned against their former client? What is the distinction between hollywood and prostitution anyways? a Camera. I don't watch movies, but the next time some celebrity whose actually (not through a body double) done a s3x scene in a movie speaks up advocating feminism-be sure to call her a high class whore and see how she likes it. Maybe she does, haha. But A IS A, right? She's performing s3x for money, end of story. Acting less obvious caste system has existed throughout the decades elevating actresses and actors above streetwalkers and johns, but I digress. But the feminist pushback against the elitists is having a secondary effect against women. Men are becoming afraid to mentor women; men are just one false accusation away from the permanent poor cardboard box. And if we don't actively hire, recruit them, promote them, we are sued anyways. You know, it is a great time for the men of the country, particularly the successful men to look at what they have, the direction this country is going, look at what they can do with what they have, and leave the country and go Galt. Destruction is all feminist want, recognize that and get out of harms way. We are in the lions den, we got to get the hell out. The lionesses are the hunters, we are the prey.
Capitalism has already ended, the best talent for the best value has ended the moment the second wave feminist movement gained traction. Leave in peace to the middle of a ranch in a country where women care about the family, and read one day on the drudgereport how America under feminist rule has collapsed. They scared away, false accused, and isolated the top talent too much, and the debt and/or industrial collapsed-and only selectively bred with animals. While you have a giant ranch and plenty of food, the 400lb man hating feminist will go on a diet-After eating her 54 cat collection. She might even have to work the streets servicing men for food after she looses rolls of fat, and she probably wished that meant making them a sandwich. An important life skill she could have learned if she worked at subway, instead of writing for buzzfeed/huffpo/jezebel because she studied gender studies to b*tch about income inequality because she was too stupid to LEARN TO CODE and get a decent paying job. The gun control nuts will start taking up arms, and defending their food supply, or killing others for food. Reality is a b****, and God might have a sense of humor when God's Judgement against American Feminism is declared and executed. Well, I love cats. I don't want anything bad to happen to a cute little kitty cat-its not their fault they are victims of a 400 lbs blue haired stinky man hating ogress who thinks her weight is healthy enough to evade diabetes, joint degeneration, heart disease, etc.. But those lesbian feminist do love to eat ahem, err, food and in the final days of socialism pets are food. To step away out of harms way and let the inevitable collapse happen, may be the best financial decision you made in your life. Remember how they destroy Highly skilled individuals, sending a grown men crying and apologizing for wearing a shirt with bikini clad women on it, while landing a probe on a moving asteroid. Making a career out of the outrage culture is so much easier than learning how to achieve, so they have to systematically destroy the achievements of others. Have you ever read the literature pushed by feminist, heck...they can hardly hold a rally these days without emphasizing their genitalia or secondary s3x organs. They might even dress up in giant costumes representing it, and they b**** and scream about a guy wearing a bowling shirt with bikini clad women on it. The only thing you can really define feminism in America as, and the culture they have created, is INSANITY. Even Feminist will call it utter madness.
If there are any bad boys out there that women dig, sure treat women better. But trying to become what women want, trying to become what feminist want, isn't want real women want men to be. You will be miserable, alone, pathetic, weak, a groveling idiot with no confidence begging for unrequited female companionship with almost no ability to be assertive, perhaps devoid of your ability to make judgments about the world around you. You've already found a niche of what women want, don't change that unless the market itself changes. They are refusing to make the changes for themselves that would enable them to accept any man that they claim they want, because they don't really want it.
Thus, you shouldn't change either. It is up to us forced ascetics to take a whip, and kick over the social money changers tables as Jesus would do. To shut down socialism, to get rid of title ix and title vii, to get rid of the feminist star chambers. You bad boys should join us, especially since they seek to lock you up any time you experience a hardship in life where you cannot pay child support. But I don't really expect there will be much effort in this area. Billions of dollars goes to feminist causes, hardly a penny is spend to advance men's rights. But it is all men in this country, save perhaps the gays, who the feminist are ready to destroy when it is convenient.
Give the feminist a much deserved Naruto punishment of 1000 years of Death, then scream you were just playing a japanese kids game that kindergartners do to adults. Nah, don't do that, that defense won't hold water...unfortunately. Besides if feminists stink to begin with, you really don't want to do that. Kind of creepy what Book Kikashi was reading when he did that move. I don't think he will have much of a defense, send that future hokage(sp) and savior of the world to prison. I just wanted to close in a somewhat humorous attempt.
Yeah, when we don't take life to seriously, we can laugh at stupid little attempts at humor and not think about it for what it really is for some 13 years later. To show outrage at Naruto anime for this clearly pedo styled sexual assault is being intolerant to Japanese culture, right? Are Social justice warriors allowed to hate Japanese kids cartoons and Japanese culture?