Dear CyberWay validators and community members!
As you know, team shared a list of functionality adjustments Friday, January 24th. It consists of 10 different proposals that were put on a collective Telegram poll voting process (see groups
_validators and
_validators_en).
Polls were pushed via both channels Tuesday, Jan 28th yet in beforehand (more than 3 days of advance) all the active validators were called to leave some feedback / communicate objections against any proposal by the end of Jan 27th.
Both and
reached out to our team for some additional interpretations of some proposals.
has broadcasted some thoughtful feedback. We answered him.
_The amount of the validators needed to conduct the proposals was reached by noon Jan 29th ( 32 of active validators ⅔ + 1 = 22). Apparently, 's vote would not take weight in the poll as she recently joined the validators community. _
The following validators have voted with „yes“ for the proposed 10 system contracts improvements:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
The validators who took the decision to not accept the arrangements:
The rest of the validators was nonvocal about the poll.
Based on the voting results ( https://t.me/cyberway_validators/1931; https://t.me/cyberway_validators_en/339 ) the discussed issues are taken into development by CyberWay dev team.
Thank you to everyone who reacted to the poll immediately!
Don't hesitate to join our community via:
Telegram:
- CyberWay - https://t.me/cyberway_en (for general questions and inquiries)
- CyberWay Validators - https://t.me/cyberway_validators_en (for questions and inquiries concerning validators of CyberWay platform)
- CyberWay Dev - https://t.me/cyberway_dev (for instant technical feedback from our Dev team)
Twitter:
We'll keep you updated over https://twitter.com/cyberwayio