How are land masses the same as enclosures? Why do I have to pay third parties for property I've already paid for? What evidence do you have that the individuals calling themselves government have an obligation to protect me? Which specific individuals owe me this protection?
If taxation isn't theft, why do people threaten to throw me in a cage for not submitting to it? Why do they threaten to escalate until I'm dead if I don't comply?
How are the individuals calling themselves government able to expropriate my property and protect it simultaneously? How are they able to threaten me with violence and protect me simultaneously?
Your assertions are filled with logical contradictions yet my premise is the one that's flawed?
None of what either of you said was at all responsive to anything in my article; by contrast, it was a double and triple down on the fallacies described within.
Thanks for proving my point though!
RE: Outcomes don't morally justify immoral actions.