In short, you don't understand what consent is and think that abstractions like social roles, norms, or views necessarily negate someone's ability to engage in that mental process within their own desire and will, even when there isn't any evidence of any actual coercive behavior taking place. Your arguments contain claims that require evidence and the logic you use can be used to justify banning all parent's from having children (I assume you want to ban all of the aforesaid ''predatory'' interactions entirely), which will obviously cause the human race to go extinct. Your position is an easy one to use Ad Reductio Absurdum on since it leads to that absurd conclusion through your argument's logical implications (unless you can successfully special plead).

If you think I have misrepresented your position, explain how I have done so.