Should we heavily moderate IRPG access ?

We've started checks (activity, ... see guidelines below) on the idle game accounts, in the interest of all users.

The goal is to weed out cheaters, who take away e.g. the GRCs newbies could need. 

What's your opinion on this topic ?

The poll (title: "Should we heavily moderate IRPG access ?") has ended, see here 

(ca. twice as many votes SUPPORTing the poll, see graph below). 

See also this thread.

You can vote like this:

Windows users:

• If your wallet is encrypted, fully unlock the wallet (not just for 'staking only').
• Click "Advanced", then click "Voting" to launch the voting menu.
• Right-click on "Should we heavily moderate IRPG access ?"
• Click "vote".

Linux users:

QT Wallet/daemon:

• Fully unlock your wallet.
• Navigate to the Debug Console (Help - Debug Window - Console (tab) )
• Enter one of the following commands:
• Vote to moderate: execute vote should_we_heavily_moderate_irpg_access? Yes
• Vote against: execute vote vote should_we_heavily_moderate_irpg_access? No
• Abstain: execute vote vote should_we_heavily_moderate_irpg_access? Abstain