War between witnesses, there are many who should not be so high, and there are others who should not be on the list of principal witnesses.

Although I am a newcomer here, since I only have 4 months on this platform. From the beginning I have noticed great problems that Steemit suffers I have made it known in past publications where I mentioned the problem of distribution of wealth, the misuse of SP among whales etc.

Today touches a topic that all users should care, and is the witnesses because in recent days, there has been much controversy for the aforementioned, as one that for me should be among the best 10 witnesses, and I will take the boldness to mention it Hive account@asbear, I create a new tool that shows the use of the vote among the first 20 witnesses.

And as expected between 40-60% of the votes of the main 20 witnesses are exchanged among themselves, which in my opinion should not be so bad, as long as they do a good job for the community but all the witnesses help the community? To be frank I think not, the vast majority support projects that leave more benefits for themselves than for the community in general.

That's why there is a small dispute between the main witnesses now, like for example the one of Hive account@pharesim with Hive account@jerrybanfield in which I personally support with eyes closed to Hive account@pharesim since in my opinion this man should be among the first 5 witnesses, his support for the "Minnows" is one of the most notable in this platform, and although not everything that Hive account@jerrybanfield does this badly, supports in one way or another the awarding of bad content although nowadays anyone with some SBD or STEEM, you can take a shit publication to the trends page with the use of services such as those provided by the aforementioned. That is why I support and understand Hive account@pharesim when it takes away the support of all those who vote Hive account@jerrybanfield as a witness.

An excellent idea to get out of this problem, is to follow the recommendations of Hive account@therealwolf. Which in his latest publication justify his votes to witnesses, and mostly supports the main developers of Steem and although not all have projects to help minnows, the vast majority develop software to make this a better platform.

Maybe this publication is dismissed as bad by users who already have time here, but with what little I have here I know that there is a very big problem with regard to the award of bad content, and although the content that I upload daily is bad (Crytocurrency TA) I speak for many other people who upload really quality content and their publications are undervalued.

Therefore, through this publication I invite you to reflect and choose more carefully the people for whom you vote as a witness, since the truth is not an insignificant issue since they are directly responsible for making the quality content is awarded.

Finally I invite all the people who support my point of view to reSteem this publication so that it can reach as many people as possible, who did not like it, I invite you to reflect your point of view commenting.