By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
Another grim Ministry of Defense (MoD) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that President Putin has authorized a “direct strike” on a new US military base in the Tanf border crossing area between Syria and Iraq where it’s warned “a showdown is looming” between Russia and the United States that could lead to a major conflict between all warring parties, if not all out nuclear war. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
Note: The American military presence, and actions, in Syria are in violation of the UN Charter and US Constitution.
According to this report, this “direct strike” upon American forces in Syria authorized today by President Putin is in response to the Trump administration warning last week that they are planning for the next stage of this war the Americans describe as “a complex fight that will bring them into direct conflict with Syrian government and Iranian forces contesting control of a vast desert stretch in the eastern part of the country”.
Further necessitating this “direct strike” upon American forces in Syria, this report continues, was the US, yesterday, falsely claiming that Syria was preparing to use chemical weapons against Islamic terror forces ravaging their country, and that the United States threatened to retaliate against—with Trump’s United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley stating: “Any further attacks done to the people of Syria will be blamed on Assad, but also on Russia and Iran who support him killing his own people”.
The “Syria uses chemical weapons charade” being used by the Americans, this report notes, has been exposed for the total lie it is by the American Pulitzer Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, who after being supplied with real-time intelligence documents discovered that President Trump had authorized an attack on a Syrian airfield even with his knowing that Syria had not used chemical weapons of any kind—with one US military officer even stating: “None of this makes any sense. We KNOW that there was no chemical attack... the Russians are furious. Claiming we have the real intel and know the truth... I guess it didn’t matter whether we elected Clinton or Trump.”
Critical to note, this report says, is that Seymour Hersh was given a real time “chat protocol” document detailing a conversation between a German security advisor and American military officer whose actual words stated:
US Military Officer: “Now Fox is saying we chose to hit the Syrian airfield because it is where the chemical attacks were launched from. Wow. Can't make this shit up.”
German Security Advisor: “They are. I mean, making it up.”
US Military Officer: “It's so fuckin evil.”
German Security Advisor: “Amen!!!”
Further shocking revelations from this “chat protocol” provided to Seymour Hersh, this report continues, show the confusion of these Western military officers in Syria in their not even knowing who is even in charge of these war moves with their saying:
US Military Officer: “We got a fuckin' problem”
German Security Advisor: “What happened? Is it the Trump ignoring the Intel and going to try to hit the Syrians? And that we're pissing on the Russians?”
US Military Officer: “This is bad...Things are spooling up.”
German Security Advisor: “You may not have seen trumps press conference yesterday. He's bought into the media story without asking to see the Intel. We are likely to get our asses kicked by the Russians. Fucking dangerous. Where are the godamn adults? The failure of the chain of command to tell the President the truth, whether he wants to hear it or not, will go down in history as one of our worst moments.”
US Military Officer: “I don't know. None of this makes any sense. We KNOW that there was no chemical attack. The Syrians struck a weapons cache (a legitimate military target) and there was collateral damage. That's it. They did not conduct any sort of a chemical attack.”
To what is really occurring, however, this report says, these Western military officers reveal by their stating:
German Security Advisor: “There has been a hidden agenda all along. This is about trying to ultimately go after Iran. What the people around Trump do not understand is that the Russians are not a paper tiger and that they have more robust military capability than we do.”
US Military Officer: “I don't know what the Russians are going to do. They might hang back and let the Syrians defend their own borders, or they might provide some sort of tepid support, or they might blow us the fuck out of the airspace and back into Iraq. I honestly don't know what to expect right now. I feel like anything is possible. The Russian air defense system is capable of taking out our TLAMs. this is a big fucking deal...we are still all systems go...”
German Security Advisor: “You are so right. Russia is not going to take this lying down”
German Security Advisor: “Who is pushing this? Is it coming from Votel?” (General Joseph L. Votel, Commander of United States Central Command, editor's note)
US Military Officer: “I don't know. It's from someone big though. . . . This is a big fucking deal.”
US Military Officer: “It has to be POTUS.”
To the “hidden agenda” being employed in Syria by the American’s, this report details, is their attempt to partition this independent nation by military force in violation of all international laws in order to link the northeastern part of Syria, which is controlled by the Kurds, with the southeastern part, that is controlled by US-backed al Qaeda rebel forces.
On 9 June, though, this report explains, this American “hidden agenda” was dealt a stunning blow when Russian-Syrian-Iranian forces made a lunge for the Syria-Iraq border along a line north of Tanf, effectively dividing US-supported elements from one another—and thus causing US-backed Islamic terror forces becoming trapped south of the new line established by Russia’s allies, and that they can’t break through without massive US military support.
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has attempted to warn the Americans about their “war folly” in Syria (“they’re playing a very dangerous game”) this report says, but further acknowledged that “new evidence has emerged in the past few days” indicating that US-led international forces continue “to take the heat off” the former Al-Qaeda offshoot in Syria.
Failing to heed any warnings, however, this report details, the American’s, instead, are continuing to plunge the entire region into chaos as evidenced by their shooting down a Syrian Air Force bomber targeting Islamic terrorists—and that Moscow labeled “an act of aggression” and “support for terrorists” with the MoD further warning that any aircraft, including planes and drones belonging to the US-led international coalition operating west of the River Euphrates, will be tracked by Russian anti-aircraft forces in the sky and on the ground and treated as targets.
Not just Syrian aircraft are the Americans now targeting either, this report says, but Iranian drones too—who have operated for years against Islamic terrorists with the full permission of the Syrian government—but that the US is now laughingly claiming is near their troops operating illegally in Syria.
With the Kremlin blasting the US over its latest lie about Syria preparing to use chemical weapons, calling it an “unprecedented provocation” and “unacceptable”, this report continues, the MoD, just hours ago, launched a submarine based ICBM across Eurasia as a further warning to the Americans to stop their aggression too—and that joins Iran’s ballistic missile strikes on ISIS targets in Syria showing the reach of their military forces.
Though some mainstream propaganda media outlets in the West are starting to awaken to grave danger being posed by the US in Syria (with Rolling Stone Magazine, for one, now warning that Trump “is risking a catastrophic open conflict with Russia”, this report concludes, it is only The Australian newspaper that is accurately describing the great danger now posed to everyone in the world by their writing today:
“Two world wars were fought in the 20th century in part because Germany escalated aggression believing that Britain would not respond, even though the evidence and the history books suggested that eventually it would. It is imperative that, distracted by Washington’s other crises, the West does not make the same mistake again.”
